Corperations 

The owner, usualy/always is a rich selfish bastard who doesn't care if other people are dying from hunger or haven't got clean drinking water etc.. but cares more about how many family buissness he/she closed down today. So many millions of lives could have be/ could be saved if these people wern't so damn greedy. The main aim of corperations is to drive down the cost of making the product so they get make a better profit, this includes moving factories to countries like india where the minimum wage is many times lower than in the 1st world, in places such as these, child labour is often used. I'm not saying that they should move out and create unemployment for countries they have their factories, but they should increase their wages to at least the american minimum wage.

T
They exploit loopholes in taxes to save money meaning we pay higher taxes to make up the difference or less money goes into the public sector which means the rich get richer and standards for poorer families go right down either way, 44 of 82 of america's top companies did not pay the standard corperation tax, but lower. 17% of these payed no taxes at all . Forbes magazine estimated this costs us $10 Billion year.
This is done by moving their headquaters to other countries, this being just one department.

The irs used to chase up these loopholes but have since given up. Instead, taxes on corperations have gone down by %26 while the average american tax went up by AT LEAST %13

Nike
Mcdonalds
Reebok
Quicksilver
all have factories in countries where the minimum wage is substantualy less than america and where child labour is used.

Corperations by Nick August 15, 2003

Corperations 

Corporations in 3rd world countries pay on average 500-800% of the income people are making there. These companies build factories there because they can pay less for labor than they would in America, meaning they in turn can charge lower prices, and sell more. By the same token, the workers who work in them don't do so to help the company, but because it's 5-8 times the money they would make at the next best alternative.

Voluntarily entered agreement to mutual benefit...the alternative is to take the Susan Sarandon approach (that is, legislate the jobs there out of existence..."better they starve"). The entire reason a company would go halfway across the world is because it's cheaper...using government Force to Coerce people into paying American wages will not mean the people there will be making more money...the companies simply won't build plants there (how could they afford to pay more for wages and for shipping? and why would any person do that?)

Bottom line, companies do not exist to provide jobs and wages. Wal-Mart does not sell bread to me for $X because I want it for that price...they offer it because the $X is more valuable to them than the bread. By the same token, I don't exist to provide income to Wal-Mart. I don't shop at Wal-Mart because it needs my money...I buy the bread because I value the bread more than my $X. But at the end of the day, each of us can only OFFER the other our property...neither can coerce the other; we each have the power to refuse the deal and walk away.

The situation is no different in India. A company can show up and build a factory, open the doors, and OFFER to pay people X. If X is worth more than their labor (which it surely will be if it's 5-8 times more than they're making now), they may choose to accept the deal. Just as the company has no right to Force people to work for them (or to order them to work under certain conditions), the individuals have no right to Force the company to hire them or employ them under certain conditions.

(As a side note, whenever a company opens a new factory over there, people typically beat down the doors to get such "low paying" jobs...they offer bribes to the employers, offer to pay their first month's salary in return for securing a job for a family member, etc. What we consider low paying here is actually an opportunity few of them would ever see, as it is more than any other place there pays them.)

The fact that even the "poor" in America on average own clothes, radios, TVs, at least 1 CAR, phones, air conditioning, a dishwasher, and a multitude of other conveniences that the "better off" in countries can only dream of owning is the result of (semi) Free, unCoerced interaction with one another...and corporations are an incredibly efficient way for entrepreneurs to team together and invest capital to create more products, wealth, and job opportunities than anything else in all of history.

www.capmag.com if you want to learn about Freedom and Individual Rights (which go hand in hand)

Corperations by tb11 April 22, 2004

Ceraphin Corporation 

Ceraphin Corporation, Inc (stylized as Ceraphin Corporation) is a Private Entertainment Organization, Publisher, and Mass Media Brand owned by Werley Nortreus and Nortreus Media Group.

Ceraphin Corporation is a Private Organization, Publisher, Mass Media Brand.

Ceraphin Corporation by Mikee Brown August 1, 2018

Roblox Corporation 

A corporation that sued Ruben Sim for exposing their worker for following a nsfw furry account

Roblox Corporation: you have forfeited your life privileges, ruben sim C:<

Roblox Corporation by woolf🦊 January 1, 2022

The Genda Corporation 

One who is the master at the game of monopoly.

Someone who is unbeatable at Monopoly.

Jim bought Park Place and said "The Genda Corporation"

Dennis knew his money was getting low, The Genda Corporation had most of the properties.

The Genda Corporation by cheeks1128yahoo February 6, 2010

Corporationalism 

Corporationalism (Noun) is an economic and political theory advocating the rights and power of Corporation(s) over the individual, people, governments, locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. Its main characteristic are that it is fiercely opposed to "red tape", which can be anything from bank reform, union membership and health insurance reform to extra safety costs, the big corporations see government as a potential hindrance to their activities. Its main goal is to make the largest profit for its shareholders, for the least amount of costs. It is derived by the earlier concept of Corporatism.

Currently Corporatism is being replaced by a new, highly government- and regulation-resistant strain of "corporationalism". Corporatism has been known by many words in the past such as Corporate Capitalism Imperialism, Colonialization, Fascism.

Examples of Corporationalism include:

Citizens United v FEC(2010) landmark decision by the U.St. Sup. Ct., holding corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in elections cannot be limited under the 1st Amndt.

Massey Energy's mine explosion in W.V,.
BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Bhopal disaster which is the world's worst industrial catastrophe

Corporationalism by W&M1999 August 30, 2010

Corporation

A collection of people who hate each other, working themselves to death to make someone else rich.

"He's had three heart attacks in the last six months, hasn't seen his kids and a year and will gladly tell you the sky is beet red if his boss says so. He's a real asset to the corporation."

Corporation by Salieri82 July 22, 2009