N. What Prosecutors do to "alleged" child sex offenders, and their families for their kids playing "Doctor," or SEXting and charging them with RAPE, and other crimes. Also applicable to those who never intended to receive said SEXTing messages, and got charged anyway for having child pornography.
That County Prosecutor in the State of "insert pretty much any State name here," Judicially Molested that child and their family because he wanted to advance his career, and did not care of the broader effects of the prosecution.
A person who works in law enforcement with a significant level of power, (Judge, Prosecutor, Detective, Policeman/Policewoman, Attorney General, etc.) who uses his/her power to maliciously target and falsely charge law abiding citizens, in an attempt to advance his/her own career. The victim is used as a brownie point for the Judicial Predator so that he/she can gain favor in the public eye. The Judicial Predator’s ultimate goal is to create the illusion that he/she is good at doing one’s job, this is all done at the expense of a good law abiding citizen who was targeted and in some cases lured into a trap set up specifically for them.
WTF, Linda Fairstein is such a Judicial Predator! She maliciously prosecuted those 5 innocent blackboys (aka the Central Park 5) and put them in prison for years, for a crime they didn't even commit! & to think all of this was to receive praise & make herself look good in the public eye. SAD. Well, It all backfired in the end & now people see her for what she truly is.
Anything and everything that exists in this parallel universe where we are mere blipses in the concept of time that we have created to help comprehend with the harsh reality that more exist the beyond out inferior and menial minds
Tom: *says something unimportant*
Aaron: yeh...... but Judicial Law
A term used by conservatives to describe court decisions which they disagree with. More often than not, applies to cases where the court declined the opportunity use its power, such as in the Terri Schiavo case, or Korematsu v. United States (1944).
In a Republican's mind, Lawrence v. Texas (2003) is an 'activist decision' while Bush v. Gore (2001) is not.
A meaningless, unimpressive, self-serving introduction. An indicator that the story about to be shared will be pointless and dumb.
Back when I lived in upstate new york, I also had to park on the street - on two occasions, we got enough snow, mixed with just the right plowing, that my car was lifted off the ground from so much snow being jammed underneath it.
Sister: This meeting was to discuss the rough draft of my essay, where we discussed the subsidiary questions I added in my rough draft. We also discussed the relationship between my main title and the real-life situations I chose to use in my essay. We discussed the structure of my essay as well, specifically the Math AOK section and how it relates to the contradiction of the title. This second meeting was particularly helpful in discussing the implications of my essay claims and how to apply the title across various areas of knowledge. There were many sections of the essay that could have been cut down in wordiness and the ways of knowing required further and more in-depth analysis.
An absolutely foolproof way to keep minors from viewing content deemed "too mature" for them to watch.
Billy: "So I was trying to watch some videos for an M rated game, and I ran into an age gate, so I put in my real birthday. SOMEHOW it managed to figure out that I am 12. CURSE YOU AGE GATE!!!"
Bill: "Fucking age gate! *quick scroll* THERE! I was born on January 1, 1904. Fuck you age gate."