SLURS

St. Lawrence University Republicans. Refers to any racist, fascist student organization, or the members of such an organization. Members of these organizations are typically rich white fucks whose goal in life is to be greedy and kill babies. Often, as is the case at SLU, the majority of Slurs are in bed with the administration.

WARNING: The fascist, Bush-loving, Dolly Dolphin-toting SLURS have teamed up with the money-hungry, power-tripping administration to destroy our once wonderful university! Quick, to the Blimh Lab to start a Blog!

by Promisebreaker May 14, 2004

Slurs

Seven deadly slurs:
-Nigga

-Faggot (Fag)
-Dyke
-Trannie

-Limey
-Honkey
-Sandwichmaker

Slurs are really bad

by Pspspspspspsps January 18, 2021

Book of Slurs

The "Book of Slurs" refers to a book full of every slur and every offensive word to exist, It isn't real but it's used in jokes.

Gabriel: *posts a fast gif of someone speaking sped up* Look! it's Jschlatt reading the Book of Slurs!
Max: HAHAHA

by microsoft windows fan September 7, 2021

jewish slurs

Something that is offensive towards primarily Jews or Jewish people.

Jack was suspended for saying all those Jewish slurs.

by A proud Jew April 21, 2018

Science Slurs

Pejorative terms used within and against scientific discourse to shut down inquiry, attack researchers' motives, or caricature positions without engagement. They are rhetorical weapons that replace argument with dismissal. On one side, terms like "pseudoscientist," "crank," or "denier" can be applied too broadly to shut down heterodox but legitimate questioning. On the other, terms like "lab-coat priest," "scientism," or "so-called expert" are used to delegitimize scientific consensus itself by framing it as a dogmatic religion.

Example: In a debate on GMOs, a scientist is called a "Monsanto shill," instantly dismissing their data as corrupt. Conversely, a philosopher questioning the limits of reductionism is labeled a "woo-peddler" or "anti-science." Terms like "climate alarmist" or "evolutionist" are crafted to frame scientific consensus as ideological. These slurs pollute the epistemic commons, turning discussions into tribal warfare where identity, not evidence, determines belief. Science Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Medical Slurs

Derogatory terms or labels, often disguised as clinical language, used to discredit, demean, or pathologize a person's lived experience, identity, or health complaints. These are not formal diagnoses but weaponized pseudo-clinical terms deployed to dismiss patients (especially from marginalized groups) by implying their problems are "all in their head," a sign of weakness, or a character flaw. They shortcut medical investigation by blaming the patient.

Example: A woman with debilitating, unexplained chronic pain is told she's just "hysterical" (a term with a deeply sexist history pathologizing the uterus). A patient with complex symptoms is labeled a "frequent flyer" or "hypochondriac" by staff, ensuring their future concerns are met with eye-rolls, not exams. The slur "crocks" (for patients with "crock" of complaints) is used in some hospital slang. These terms serve to gatekeep medical resources and absolve clinicians from diagnostic effort. Medical Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Cognitive Slurs

Insulting terms that weaponize concepts from cognitive psychology to demean someone's thinking process as inherently defective. These slurs pathologize disagreement by diagnosing the opponent with a cognitive flaw (e.g., "You're just Dunning-Krugerandized," "That's pure cognitive dissonance," "Your confirmation bias is showing"). While these are real biases, using them as casual insults strips them of their scientific meaning and turns them into sophisticated ad hominem attacks. It's a way of saying "You're too stupid to know you're stupid" while pretending to be objective.

Example: In a political debate, Person A presents a statistic. Person B, disagreeing, doesn't engage with the data source but retorts, "You're just experiencing backfire effect; your fragile worldview can't handle facts." This slur allows Person B to claim the high ground of psychological insight while functionally calling Person A an irrational idiot. It psychologizes the disagreement, making productive discourse impossible because any counter-argument can be dismissed as further proof of the alleged bias. Cognitive Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026