Eucleides 

The all-knowing, most definitely existing God in all this world. He is the one who is called I AM!
He is also a toy tiger.

PRAISE EUCLEIDES!!

Eucleides by eucleides February 7, 2010

Euclides 

Euclides is a smart, respectful, sexy, stunning, outgoing, fun, he also has a big penis, there's just so many good ways to describe Euclides. The name Euclides originated from the Greek Mathematician "Euclid" who came up with Euclidean Geometry, the basics of Geometry. He is a very charming man, known to get all the ladies, but once he finds the right woman to settle down with, she will capture his heart and be hers to keep forever.

"Yo', Euclides is the man."

Euclides by unknownandabove January 7, 2013

Euclide 

Euclide is a manly man that uses his godly appearance and charm to seduce the sexiest big boobed blonde ladies. He enjoys long walks on the beaches and taking care of his family, friends, and co-workers. Euclide may look like he is a badass that cannot be broken hearted but secretly, he is a gentle hearted man who is a sucker for love. He's pretty much a beast.

Damn did you see that guy working at PacSun today? His name must of been Euclide cause he was picking up all those big boobed blondes!

Euclide by BHayes November 8, 2012

Non-Euclidean Vagina 

A vagina so distorted from a good fucking that it no longer satisfies Euclid's parallel postulate, instead existing in more exotic geometric spaces, including but not limited to hyperbolic and Minkowskian geometries.

"Yeah bro, I wrecked that pussy so hard that for a given line L and a point A not on L, there was not exactly one line through A which did not intersect L."

"Nice dude, non-euclidean vaginas are clutch as hell."

Non-Euclidean Vagina by Erotic Cryptography October 18, 2011

Non-Euclidean Geometry 

A non-Euclidean geometry is any geometry that contrasts the fundamental ideas of Euclidean geometry, especially with the nature of parallel lines. Any geometry that does not assume the parallel postulate or any of its alternatives is an absolute geometry (Euclid's own geometry, which does not use the parallel postulate until Proposition 28, can be called a neutral geometry). The first non-Euclidean geometries arose in the exploration of disputing Euclid's notorious Fifth Postulate, which states that if a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, then the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than two right angles. Critics of the "parallel postulate" do not argue that it is a mathematical fact. Instead, they do not find it as brief, simple, and self-evident as postulates are supposed to be. Furthermore, the converse of the parallel postulate, corresponding to Proposition 27, Book I, of Euclid's Elements, has a proof, which fueled the argument that the parallel postulate should be a theorem.

Many logically equivalent statements include, but are not limited to:
1. Through a given point not on a given line, only one parallel can be drawn to the given line. (Playfair's Axiom)
2. A line that intersects one of two parallel lines intersects the other also.
3. There exists lines that are everywhere equidistant from one another.
4. The sum of the angles of a triangle is equal to two right angles.
5. For any triangle, there exists a similar noncongruent triangle.
6. Any two parallel lines have a common perpendicular.
7. There exists a circle passing through any three noncollinear points.
8. Two lines parallel to the same line are parallel to each other.

For two thousand years, geometers attempted to prove the parallel postulate, but every proof failed due to an assumption made similar to the ones above or just faulty thinking. Probably the most interesting of these are the proofs of the 17th-18th century Italian geometer Girolamo Saccheri. He tried to prove it using a reductio ad absurdum argument. By proving that the sum of the angles of a triangle cannot be greater than or less than 180 degrees, he would have achieved his goal. He successfully proved that they cannot be greater that 180 degrees, but could not find a contradiction of the latter case. He ended his proof and denied himself the opportunity to be history's first non-Euclidean geometer. This honor would be saved for two later mathematicians, Janos Bolyai and Nicolai Lobachevsky.

Both contemporaries of Carl Gauss, Lobachevsky and Bolyai did pioneering work in hyperbolic geometry, which keeps Euclid's other four postulates in tact, but supposes that through any given point not on a given line, infinitely many lines can be drawn parallel to that given line. As opposed to Euclidean geometry, which asserts that the distance between any two lines is constant, hyperbolic geometry visually means that lines curve toward each other. They discovered this to be logically coherent and a feasible alternative to Euclidean geometry. It is safe to assume that these facts were known to previous mathematicians such as Gauss and Adrien-Marie Legendre, both contributing much to elliptic functions and having conducted experiments that led them to conclude that the sum of the angles of a triangle can be less than 180 degrees. Sadly, Legendre did this in an attempt to prove the parallel postulate (hence disposing of his chance as first non-Euclidean geometer), and Gauss never published his findings in order to avoid controversy (Immanuel Kant, a prominent German philosopher of the late 1700's, in his "Critique of Pure Reason", stated the Euclidean geometry is the true geometry of the universe and to contradict it is to contradict thought itself.) Gauss did, however, discover much of differential geometry and potential theory.

Bernhard Riemann, a student of Gauss, in a famous lecture in 1854, established Riemannian geometry and discussed modern concepts such as curvature, manifolds, and (Riemannian) metrics. By giving a formula for a family of Riemannian metrics on the unit ball in Euclidean space, Riemann constructed infinitely many possible non-Euclidean geometries and provided the logical foundation for elliptic geometry, which states that through a given point not on a given line, no parallel lines exist. Visually, we can interpret this as lines curving toward each other. We cannot call Riemann, however, the sole inventor of elliptic geometry since his theory extends to all geometries, including the default Euclidean n-space. The ideas for elliptic and, mainly, hyperbolic geometry continued to develop by mathematicians of the later half of the century, such as Eugenio Beltrami, Felix Klein, and Henri Poincare. Such geometries have proven useful to the development of topology in the 20th century and to physics, notably in Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity.

Though interesting, much of non-Euclidean geometry is far too advanced to be taught in high school (or even at the undergraduate level in college!) along with basic Euclidean geometry. In order to grasp it fully and do original work in it, one must have a good working knowledge of multivariable calculus, linear and abstract algebra, real and complex analysis, and topology.

Other examples of a non-Euclidean geometry include affine geometry, the modern projective geometries of Girard Desargues, Blaise Pascal, Michel Chasles, Jean-Victor Poncelet, and Jakob Steiner, the line geometry of Julius Plucker, the algebraic geometry of Frederigo Enriques and Francesco Severi, the enumerative geometry of Hermann Schubert, and the taxicab geometry of Hermann Minkowski.

Non-Euclidean Geometry by some punk kid October 18, 2006

non-euclidean ass 

A human buttocks whose properties are such that it can not be described with any normal human though processes. Typically, used when just using the word "ass" just won't suffice.

"I am going to go back in to that bar and kick some non-euclidean ass" said Erik.

As she entered the room someone shouted "Look at that piece of non-euclidean ass!"

non-euclidean ass by a wayward s0n October 18, 2011

Euclideanism 

Whereas Godelism tells us that in order for a system object to be countable a system (or object) must must be inconsistent; Euclideanism explores what the INTERIORITY of the topological points allows sentient beings to to.

Euclideanism tells us that in order for a circle to be sliced the topological points must be interior to the surface. Any one surface-point must also be interior to allow for a thought to occur (an orthogonality between the limina and a single point on a pseudorandom perimeter (perimeter of a single twin prime or a GROUP of twin primes)).

Euclideanism argues that in order for an object to be deconstructed cut, a thought to occur, or an orthogonality to exist: at least one points on the surface must be interiorized.

In Godelism : a point must be externalized in order for an object to be counted; in Euclideanism; a point must be internalized to be CONSIDERED. Euclideanism would point to a distinction between being-counted and being-considered.

The paradox is; is that in order for a tautology 1:1 relationship between a first structure's center-point and a second shape's surface points; to be considered, or even a thought to exist; the surface-points must be internalized whereas in order for the tautology to exist; the surface-points must be externalized.

In so many words; orthogonalities are internal, but tautologies are external.

Euclideanism also tells us that the magnetic force created by the golden primes spinning twin prime numbers is INTERNAL to the plane-of-panformalism. Ie. magnetometry is internal-to-the-plane.

Euclideanism by deepchurch April 27, 2022