A subfield focusing on the psychological grip that dominant official narratives exert over populations. It investigates how hegemonic discourses become internalized as common sense, how they shape identity, and how they create psychological barriers to imagining alternatives. It also studies resistance: how individuals and groups psychologically disengage from official narratives and construct counter‑worldviews.
Example: “His research in the psychology of hegemonic official discourses revealed that citizens who had internalized the official story of the nation experienced cognitive dissonance when confronted with contrary evidence—they literally struggled to process facts that threatened their identity.”
A specialized field that examines how official discourses come to dominate public conversation, setting the terms of debate and defining what can be said. It studies the mechanisms by which certain ways of speaking—neoliberal economics, security‑state rhetoric, technocratic solutions—become so naturalized that alternatives seem unrealistic or radical. The study of hegemonic official discourses tracks how power becomes embedded in language and how counter‑discourses are marginalized.
Example: “The study of hegemonic official discourses showed how the phrase ‘there is no alternative’ (TINA) had been repeated so often by officials that it became a self‑fulfilling prophecy, foreclosing any discussion of economic alternatives.”
A brawl, “donnybrook,” fracas, or melee illegally initiated by benighted fools with less real teeth than fingers who are manipulated by an insecureman with an IQ of 60 and a micro-penis.
Don Jr: “Do you want to go to the OneAmerica News Network and hang out?”
Eric: “Are you sure? It sounds like Legitimate Political Discourse just waiting to happen.”
Term for when gun control advocates regularly censor comments on their message boards or blogs. Usually when their arguments and claims are easily refuted.
Term comes from the last days of the oldBrady Campaign blog where they ran a series called, of course 'Reasoned Discourse' where they highlighted alleged violent or disgusting comments they had received. This was shortly before they blocked all comments and later deleted them.
I pointed out that murder was already illegal and that making it moreso with a special gun murder statute was a bitsilly. Reasoned discourse broke out, and my comment vanished from the blog.
Whatever discussions are trending among the MeDiA eLiTe on Twitter.com – good/bad/hot/lukewarm takes, viral personal essays, cancellations, any content ripe for mining/dissecting/ruining et al.
And dying in yo' bed many years from now, would ya be willing ta trade all da days from dis here day ta dat fo' one chance, just one chance, ta come back here as young men an' tell our enemies dat dey may take our lives but dey will never take our freedom ... YUB NUB!
The Bar came before the movie. It is an awesome bar where the girls know how to party and make you feel okay about giving up your money, drawers, bras, and dignity.
2. Movie
A story about a Jersey girl following her dreams, aided by working at this bar in New York.
3. Situation/Person/Decision
See other definitions - waking up next to someone so ugly you'd rather chew your arm off than wake them up.
1. Yo, Coyote Ugly is my favorite bar! I got whipped, stripped, drunk, and danced on the bar all before 7 o'clock!
2. Hey did you see Coyote Ugly? It actually has a plot!
A meaningless, unimpressive, self-serving introduction. An indicator that the story about to be shared will be pointless and dumb.
Back when I lived in upstate new york, I also had to park on the street - on two occasions, we got enough snow, mixed with just the right plowing, that my car was lifted off the ground from so much snow being jammed underneath it.
Sister: This meeting was to discuss the rough draft of my essay, where we discussed the subsidiary questions I added in my rough draft. We also discussed the relationship between my main title and the real-life situations I chose to use in my essay. We discussed the structure of my essay as well, specifically the Math AOK section and how it relates to the contradiction of the title. This second meeting was particularly helpful in discussing the implications of my essay claims and how to apply the title across various areas of knowledge. There were many sections of the essay that could have been cut down in wordiness and the ways of knowing required further and more in-depth analysis.