The art of writing in the snow with the special, focused aim of pee. This skill is something you're either born with or not. Apparently practice will not help you.
caroline: can you write my name in the snow?
jaden: my friend can do it with his pee!
caroline: oh no.
jaden: its called peenmanship duh.
1) The art or practice of writing with ones genitile organ.
2) Quality or style of writing with the genitile organ.
1."That is some nice peemanship you have. I like the way you pee your "t's"."
2."I have to pee."
"Well, don't waste your ink. Practice on improving your peemanship!"
3. "Hey, Bro. Did you see that chick's peemanship?"
"No, man. Was it decent?"
"Not even worth checking out. She has some pretty piss poor peemanship!"
the physical art (regardless of whether or not the piece of writing is actually correct in terms in of spelling, grammar, morphology, syntax etc..) of legible human handwriting.
father (after reading a student-to-parent from his daughter's school: really? is this f-sag or what? They want you to hand in all your written homework as computer documents? what these tulips are trying to accomplish by abolishing penmanship is beyond me.
A meaningless, unimpressive, self-serving introduction. An indicator that the story about to be shared will be pointless and dumb.
Back when I lived in upstate new york, I also had to park on the street - on two occasions, we got enough snow, mixed with just the right plowing, that my car was lifted off the ground from so much snow being jammed underneath it.
Sister: This meeting was to discuss the rough draft of my essay, where we discussed the subsidiary questions I added in my rough draft. We also discussed the relationship between my main title and the real-life situations I chose to use in my essay. We discussed the structure of my essay as well, specifically the Math AOK section and how it relates to the contradiction of the title. This second meeting was particularly helpful in discussing the implications of my essay claims and how to apply the title across various areas of knowledge. There were many sections of the essay that could have been cut down in wordiness and the ways of knowing required further and more in-depth analysis.