A fictitious creek, that has shit flowing just like water would normally flow. As a figure of speech, one might say "I am drowning!", but if it worse than that, one may say "I am drowning in shitcreek".
If one creek did exist, one would probably have more of a chance of living after falling in shitcreek, than a normal creek, due to the viscosity of feces being higher. Most people usually do not think about this, because it’s not something you think about.
"If you do not complete that proposal, we are going to be 15 miles up shitcreek."
The appearance of having been hiding behind a screen door that someone was throwing shit at. Often used in reference to person(s) with large amount of freckles.
Oh man, that girls is so cute but she is sooo shit-screen.
Origin: Was coined in BurlingtonMassachusetts but not sure if it was used anywhere else
A photograph of a computer or phone screen. The clumsy and often awkwardly angled and poorly litalternative to a screenshot, the correct way to capture the contents of a screen.
Hey Bobby, Grandmatook a shotscreen again, can you teach her how to take a screenshot?
Nickname given to bales of marijuana thrown overboard or out of airplanes. Origin is reportedly from members of the US Coast Guard in the area of Southern Florida.
A sunburn or suntan focused on the left arm. It is caused by the left side of the body being the only half that gets exposed to sunlight while driving. Presumably, it would be located on the right side of the body in countries where they drive on the left side of the road.
I had a trucker's tan after driving for 10 straight hours on a sunny day.
British slang for a scientist or technical expert, esp . when the speaker is not certain of the expert’s specific field of study. Not necessarily derogatory, but typically used by persons without a technical background. In the US, the equivalent would be “egghead”, “squint”, or “geek.”
Origin of the word is unknown. Started sometime in World War 2. Given the typical evolution of British slang, could easily have started because what these experts did was confusing or “baffling” to the common person.