A comparison you have made, usually followed by a variation of the word '
whatever' when you do not recall what the name of the literary device(s) you just used are.
Something said maybe not literally(1),
maybe literally(2) which is literally(1(as references literally(2))) just as important when you want to make an important point. At this point, who cares whether it was a metaphor or a simile? What are you, a grammar troll? Let it
go. Come out from under the bridge and stop correcting people all the
time. There you go. Stand up
straight and stretch until you can feel your lower back arch a little and a big percent of that stress goes *ahhhhh*. Like that. A 'metasimile' for 'Keep it
Player' which some white
guy may have mis-heard when someone said 'Keep it,
Player' as someone tried to hand them something they didn't want to be in possesion of, whhich was why they accompanied the phrase with an gently upraised, palm-first 'no thank you' gesture.
Caution: metasimiles are prone to endless recursion which may provoke stack or heap overflow.
A metasimile is constrained in that it must always be an antisolecism, except as used in the example sentence.
"A metasimile should never be a solecism, unless you are
Conan O'Brien."
Honestly? After that
definition? me-ta-sim-i-le not
meta-simile would be the most cross-domain way of saying 'metasimile' but you can pronounce it however you want. It's like 'SQL' that way, in that normally efficient people insist on not saying just 'See-kweel' like a normal person would after saying it more than 3 times, but instead say 'Ess Kwyoo(?) Ell' for decades? That was just a metasimile, or something.