Skip to main content
St. Lawrence University Republicans. Refers to any racist, fascist student organization, or the members of such an organization. Members of these organizations are typically rich white fucks whose goal in life is to be greedy and kill babies. Often, as is the case at SLU, the majority of Slurs are in bed with the administration.
WARNING: The fascist, Bush-loving, Dolly Dolphin-toting SLURS have teamed up with the money-hungry, power-tripping administration to destroy our once wonderful university! Quick, to the Blimh Lab to start a Blog!
SLURS by Promisebreaker May 14, 2004
Seven deadly slurs:
-Nigga

-Faggot (Fag)
-Dyke
-Trannie

-Limey
-Honkey
-Sandwichmaker
Slurs are really bad
Slurs by Pspspspspspsps January 18, 2021
Related Words

Book of Slurs 

The "Book of Slurs" refers to a book full of every slur and every offensive word to exist, It isn't real but it's used in jokes.
Gabriel: *posts a fast gif of someone speaking sped up* Look! it's Jschlatt reading the Book of Slurs!
Max: HAHAHA

jewish slurs 

Something that is offensive towards primarily Jews or Jewish people.
Jack was suspended for saying all those Jewish slurs.
jewish slurs by A proud Jew April 21, 2018

Science Slurs

Pejorative terms used within and against scientific discourse to shut down inquiry, attack researchers' motives, or caricature positions without engagement. They are rhetorical weapons that replace argument with dismissal. On one side, terms like "pseudoscientist," "crank," or "denier" can be applied too broadly to shut down heterodox but legitimate questioning. On the other, terms like "lab-coat priest," "scientism," or "so-called expert" are used to delegitimize scientific consensus itself by framing it as a dogmatic religion.
Example: In a debate on GMOs, a scientist is called a "Monsanto shill," instantly dismissing their data as corrupt. Conversely, a philosopher questioning the limits of reductionism is labeled a "woo-peddler" or "anti-science." Terms like "climate alarmist" or "evolutionist" are crafted to frame scientific consensus as ideological. These slurs pollute the epistemic commons, turning discussions into tribal warfare where identity, not evidence, determines belief. Science Slurs.
Science Slurs by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Medical Slurs

Derogatory terms or labels, often disguised as clinical language, used to discredit, demean, or pathologize a person's lived experience, identity, or health complaints. These are not formal diagnoses but weaponized pseudo-clinical terms deployed to dismiss patients (especially from marginalized groups) by implying their problems are "all in their head," a sign of weakness, or a character flaw. They shortcut medical investigation by blaming the patient.
Example: A woman with debilitating, unexplained chronic pain is told she's just "hysterical" (a term with a deeply sexist history pathologizing the uterus). A patient with complex symptoms is labeled a "frequent flyer" or "hypochondriac" by staff, ensuring their future concerns are met with eye-rolls, not exams. The slur "crocks" (for patients with "crock" of complaints) is used in some hospital slang. These terms serve to gatekeep medical resources and absolve clinicians from diagnostic effort. Medical Slurs.
Medical Slurs by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Psychological Slurs

Terms that use mental health concepts as generic insults to imply instability, irrationality, or weakness. These slurs (e.g., "You're paranoid," "She's hysterical," "That's psychotic," "Don't be so borderline") take serious clinical conditions and deploy them to dismiss emotional reactions, legitimate concerns, or unconventional beliefs. They are the modern equivalent of calling someone "insane" to win an argument, and they massively contribute to the stigma around mental illness by making diagnoses synonymous with being wrong or unhinged.
Example: A community organizer expresses passionate, urgent concern about a local environmental hazard. A corporate representative, aiming to discredit them, tells the media the organizer is "histrionic" and "prone to panic attacks," subtly framing their advocacy as a symptom of mental instability rather than a reasoned response to threat. The slur pathologizes justified emotion and civic engagement, shifting the discussion from "is there a hazard?" to "is the complainant sound of mind?" Psychological Slurs.
Psychological Slurs by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026