Popaterian

Someone who does not drink fizzy pop e.g. lemonade, cola ect

I don't drink fizzy pop, I am a popaterian.

Popaterian by popaterianqueen6969420 September 3, 2018

Poopatarian 

A person or peoples who resort to the life of a VEGETARIAN, yet add their own faeces twist . . .

"Hey, did you see that girl?"
"Yeah, didn't you know she's a poopatarian?"
"Eww"

Poopatarian by Anonmanomous June 10, 2007

picaterian

A "picaterian" is a person that eats anything other than what a true vegetarian eats. A true vegetarian only eats from plant-based, fungi-based, or algae-based food source. The terms ovo-vegetarian, lacto-vegetarian, ovo-lacto-vegetarian, and pescatarian are not valid vegetarian diet options. Vegans also eat a vegetarian diet. "Pica," the root word for picaterian comes from the is a medical disorder, "Pica." "Those with Pica have an appetite for substances largely non-nutritive (e.g., metal, clay, coal, sand, dirt, soil, feces, chalk, pens and pencils, paper, batteries, spoons, toothbrushes, soap, mucus, ash, gum, etc.; or an abnormal appetite for food ingredients (e.g. flour, raw potato, raw rice, starch, ice cubes, salt)."

Terry says he only eats "farm-fresh" eggs and thinks he is a vegetarian. Some say that he is ovo-vegetarian, but he is really a "picaterian."

Lesley says that she eats fish for health reasons. Since fish has been contaminated with lead and mercury, it is not healthy. People that eat lead, mercury, and fish are "picaterians."

picaterian by PDM(c) June 13, 2011

Porkaterian 

Somebody who only eats pork

I only eat pork, I'm a porkaterian

Porkaterian by P.Coley July 3, 2020

Non-Popperian Epistemology

Any epistemological framework that rejects or radically modifies Karl Popper’s key tenets: falsification as the demarcation criterion (a theory is scientific only if it is falsifiable), the asymmetry between verification and falsification, and the rejection of inductive reasoning. Non‑Popperian epistemologies include Bayesian epistemology (beliefs updated by probabilities, which uses induction), Kuhnian paradigm theory (science progresses through revolutions, not falsification), and various forms of coherentism or reliabilism. They argue that Popper’s norms describe only a small part of actual scientific practice (e.g., falsification works poorly for historical sciences like cosmology). Non‑Popperian approaches often accept that evidence can confirm theories, not just falsify them, and that scientific knowledge is socially and historically situated.

Non-Popperian Epistemology Example: “Non‑Popperian epistemology points out that geologists accept plate tectonics not because it has survived falsification attempts, but because it unifies diverse observations in a coherent framework—confirmation, not falsification, drove acceptance.”

Non-Popperian Epistemology by Abzugal June 2, 2026