Skip to main content

Adversus solem ne loquitor

It comes from latin and means "Don't speak against the sun" (don't waste your time arguing the obvious)
"-I'm sure! The Earth has two moons!
-You know that's impossible! Adversus solem ne loquitor.
Adversus solem ne loquitor by nundu November 12, 2009
Sweet,kind,always smiling, helpful to others,boss, well groomed, professional,enthusiastic,detailed oriented,organized,very cultured,loves to travel, very sexual
Lequita is a kind of woman that's enthusiastic, sexy, organized, and cultural boss..
Lequita by QdaysQdays December 20, 2016

res ipsa loquitur 

The thing speaks for itself. Legal term for something which is self-evident.
res ipsa loquitur by Kurtz February 10, 2004
Ghetto Ma ; or a fly ass bitch; someone who is fresh to death, ain't afraid of nobody, & is also beautiful & fine.
That's my Laquita, what up gurl !!!!!!!!!!!!!
laquita by *Bibi* March 7, 2007
A woman who farts like an elephant. "Kitas" as they are known tend to have an over active anal gland that causes extremely powerful gas bubbles. Most are very good at investigations, but tend to miss work due to their gastric complications.
Damn....was that you LAQUITA?
laquita by El Doctor Gasso January 15, 2010

res ipsa loquitur prima facie 

Literally, " The thing, itself, speaks, at first face. "

An ideal of hermeneutics which insists that the logical foundation for an interpretation should be the most straightforward, most obvious, most logical, most self-evident reading which one would most likely assume from a text when taking it as it comes to one, or reading it as it as, in it's own terms and in its own words, at face value.

Ideally it is an attempt to read a text with fresh wide-open eyes, free from prejudices and preconceptions and all outside influences; as if reading it for the first time, with no foreknowledge, thereof. Ideal in theory but likely impossible in practice.

Further elaborations should be built upon this foundation if and only if sound, valid, objective, and logical reasons exist to support such deviations.
Your intrepretation seems contrived and doesn't fit well with the spirit of res ipsa loquitur prima facie.