'logic' & 'literally' combined in context to what is in conversation, with DRAMATIC SARCASM EMPHASIZED 😅 (get your crayon out & paper & write this down😂)
For instance, your phone may be nearly out of battery, so you have to hold your phone and charger at a particular angle to keep it charging. The movement will dislodge the charger at the worst possible moment, with the risk of phone dying being a real threat.
"Bruh I had a logistically challenging wank last night, Jesus Christ it was more difficult than doing the Christmas shopping
Oh no I know it's logistically irrelevant and the way you said it makes it sound like something Mik said... Which is funny. But no. I know that but that doesn't stop them from being insatiable, fat cock obsessed, gremlins does it?
Hym "No I know it's logistically irrelevant that isn't the issue is it?"
A position within a debate or discourse that is granted unearned authority—not because its arguments are stronger but because it's associated with dominant institutions, cultures, or power structures. A logically privileged position gets to define the terms of debate, set the standards of evidence, determine what counts as logical. Its claims are taken seriously by default; its opponents must work twice as hard to be heard. The logically privileged position doesn't have to prove itself; it's presumed valid until proven otherwise. This privilege is invisible to those who hold it—they just think they're being logical.
Logically Privileged Position Example: "In the debate, his position was logically privileged: he spoke from a prestigious university, cited mainstream sources, used familiar frameworks. Her position, from a marginalized community, using alternative sources, was constantly questioned. The privilege wasn't in his arguments; it was in his position. He didn't have to work to be heard; she did."
A social and rhetorical stance where logical form—validity, syllogistic structure, freedom from informal fallacies—is elevated to the highest standard of discourse, and any deviation is treated as a moral or intellectual failure. Adherents police language not for harm but for “illogic,” often dismissing arguments based on perceived violations of formal reasoning while ignoring context, power dynamics, or lived experience. “Logically correct” becomes a gatekeeping tool: those who cannot frame their concerns in syllogisms are dismissed as irrational, and any emotional or embodied knowledge is automatically suspect. It mirrors political correctness in its zeal for orthodoxy but replaces social justice with logical purity.
Example: “She described her experience of workplace discrimination; he responded by dissecting her narrative for ‘hasty generalizations.’ He wasn’t engaging—he was being logically correct, using the tools of logic to silence testimony.”