A phrase implied ironically in situations where a person is trying to reach the conclusion of something and failing or when thinking of what to do in a critical situation. Inspired by the internet's ironic implications on feminism.
Jacob: All of my data was posted online, what do I do??
Sunnie: What would a feminist do?
Instead of "How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck norris?"
How about How much wood would a chuck norris chuck if a chuck norris would chuck wood?
Son: Dad, How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Dad: A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Well, to measure the amount, the chucker had to count, which only a human could. Well if the counter couldn't chuck and the chucker couldn't count then there is nothing each other could say. The only conclusion and the single solution is that chucking wood is gay.
This is difficult to question answer. The amount of wood that woodchucks would chuck on a given day varies greatly with the individual woodchuck. According to a Wall Street Journal article, New York State wildlife expert Richard Thomas found that a woodchuck could chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equal to 700 pounds. Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
Sawford: how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?
Hot naked babe:If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it. *gets tits out*
....
sawford dies