The moment when the type of required evidence itself becomes the
moving target. An arguer doesn't just move the goalpost for what will convince them; they shift the
fundamental category of proof required (e.g., from
statistics to personal testimony to historical documents and back), ensuring the debate remains forever about the rules of validation, not the substance.
Example:
Person A: “Here are crime
statistics.”
Person B: “Statistics can be
manipulated. I need a victim’s testimony.”
Person A: “Here’s a victim’s interview.”
Person B: “That’s just one emotional story. I need hard data.”
They aren’t engaging with evidence; they’re constantly
moving the proofgoalpost.