Double texting is an absurd new way to turn an entire aspect of social communication into a taboo irrational
thing. Generally used by normies that can't argue and instead spend times writing fallacious ad hominem arguments, but also an influencer that knows how to
trick easily influenced people.
In practice, the meaning is vague and ambiguous , leaving the user the
choice to use this new "trendy(sic)" term as they please. It generally means either that :
-the opposite interlocutor has sent multiple messages in a row .
-the opposite interlocutor is simulteanously talking with two persons , including the user.
According to the second
definition, if a frequent double text caller also listens to rap (which tends to be the
case in newer generations which will use this "trendy new term") , it is very plausible that they'
ll recoil in fear due to a cognitive dissonance as people point out the
rapper they listen to also tends to "double text", if not "octuple text" , and many times in a row .
See also: fallacy , argument , normie and more specifically simian .
E.g:
X and Y are in a heated argument about a bomb , about which Y barely reveals anything. Y is the double
text caller.
Y: Uh uh, no, well I think this bomb is at least 100 times stronger than 50 kilotons.
Y: 1000* lol i didn't notice
Y: one zero didn't appear
Here, X does not take action concerning the fact Y "double texted" , simply because they
aren't interested in this kind of "trendy terms" and would rather get educated.
X: Absolutely wrong. Assuming it is a regular
old chemical-
based bomb, you simply can't reach such powers above 11t.
X: Mind you, not kt (kiloton), just t (
ton) of TNT.
Y: uuuuuugh r u double texting ?
Y: double texter SMH SMH SMH
Y Proceeds to then
spam a half ton of unicode symbols that contain colors, more specifically
yellow faces displaying Y's apparent annoyance for the double
text, although it is evident they simply can't argue at X's level and are bothered by it.
--
(Note: 11 tons of TNT of
power is referring to the MOAB's
blast yield, which is (currently) the highest of any chemical/regular bombs. Nuclear bombs can reach much higher yields measured sometimes in the megatons because they convert
mass into energy much more efficiently (Chemical bombs barely convert anything to E in E=
MC² , while nuclear fission bombs reach 4% at best (which is still rather efficient compared to , for example, coal plants, which explains how optimal atomic plants are compared to something that barely releases any energy.))
