BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros (also known as Mr.Fink) are two atheist users on Wikipedia. They are self-professed scientists but with no qualifications, they are men who are ardent and delusional anti-theists with an inexplicable hatred towards religion and God (who they claim not to believe in so their hatred for him is illogical).
Both users stalk a certain selection of articles on Wikipedia (mainly the abiogenesis article) which they defend with aggressiveness and the view that their opinions and only their opinions are right. Both users are completely narrow minded and against views that disagree with their delusional beliefs.
For a self-professed biologist, BatteryIncluded doesn't understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Abiogenesis is a hypothesis that attempts to explain how life may have arose from non-living chemicals. Evolution is a scientific theory which explains how life evolved and the variation of species because of it. A person can hold evolution to be true but abiogenesis to be false. Honest researchers do not accept abiogenesis as factual because, unlike evolution, it has never been observed and has no empirical evidence. From a scientific perceptive, the actual origin of life remains a mystery still. The answer to the origins of life could very well be abiogenesis though and contrary to the views of BatteryIncluded, Apokryltaros and other extremist atheists, this doesn't refute God.
Both users stalk a certain selection of articles on Wikipedia (mainly the abiogenesis article) which they defend with aggressiveness and the view that their opinions and only their opinions are right. Both users are completely narrow minded and against views that disagree with their delusional beliefs.
For a self-professed biologist, BatteryIncluded doesn't understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Abiogenesis is a hypothesis that attempts to explain how life may have arose from non-living chemicals. Evolution is a scientific theory which explains how life evolved and the variation of species because of it. A person can hold evolution to be true but abiogenesis to be false. Honest researchers do not accept abiogenesis as factual because, unlike evolution, it has never been observed and has no empirical evidence. From a scientific perceptive, the actual origin of life remains a mystery still. The answer to the origins of life could very well be abiogenesis though and contrary to the views of BatteryIncluded, Apokryltaros and other extremist atheists, this doesn't refute God.
No natural process in existence refutes the concept of God since natural processes merely explain "how" and not "where" all matter and energy came from. Of course BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros get really really mad should you ask them to demonstrate their blind faith in the hypothetical magical atheist idea that universes can arise from nothing out of singularities that appear from nothing since it's evidenceless.
The Big Bang theory has presented a huge obstacle for these fools as it states the universe had a beginning. The two answers to its beginning is that it either arose from nothing (which is contrary to the principle of causality) or that it came from an unmoved eternal prime mover, i.e a god. So far, atheists have been unable to demonstrate or prove something from nothing and therefore their philosophy remains dead.
BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros are examples of Wikipedians who use their editing privileges to censor other viewpoints and bully and harass users. They are quite often psychotic with their gibberish and are quite clearly giving out blow jobs to admins so that they don't get banned even when abusing the system of Wikipedia by closing talk page subjects as "soapboxes" whenever someone comes in and refutes their magical atheist belief that matter and energy can just "pop" into existence from nothing.
The Big Bang theory has presented a huge obstacle for these fools as it states the universe had a beginning. The two answers to its beginning is that it either arose from nothing (which is contrary to the principle of causality) or that it came from an unmoved eternal prime mover, i.e a god. So far, atheists have been unable to demonstrate or prove something from nothing and therefore their philosophy remains dead.
BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros are examples of Wikipedians who use their editing privileges to censor other viewpoints and bully and harass users. They are quite often psychotic with their gibberish and are quite clearly giving out blow jobs to admins so that they don't get banned even when abusing the system of Wikipedia by closing talk page subjects as "soapboxes" whenever someone comes in and refutes their magical atheist belief that matter and energy can just "pop" into existence from nothing.
by Silly Atheists October 26, 2014
Get the BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros mug.by Burritowagon May 11, 2010
Get the Baby Batter Blaster mug.Related Words
blattered
• Blatters
• Blatter'd
• Blätterbesen
• blatteroon
• blatterson
• sepp blatter
• flatter-blatter
• Sepp Blattered
• battery
Hey d you think i have a chance with Arson?
No, they're a tripple a battery so you've got no chance
Dang...
No, they're a tripple a battery so you've got no chance
Dang...
by im u fucking sadist17 May 20, 2021
Get the tripple a battery mug.When someone attempts to give a "Vinny Caruso" and fails, the Brooklyn batter is said to appear from the trunk of a '96 Chevy Caprice with a baseball bat and straighten things out.
After getting a blumpkin from a girl, I tried to give a girl the Vinny Caruso but I didn't have enough gas left, so the Brooklyn Batter came out and took his revenge on me off 26th and Douchebag
by MikeDfromDaBlock March 1, 2009
Get the Brooklyn Batter mug.by Don Kiddick May 26, 2004
Get the flange batter mug.n. cross between "utter" and "blab/blubber/bluster" and such. Meant to convey a sense of poorly chosen words spoken in passion.
Bernie: She said what she heard wouldn't be hearsay. She looked it up. We were arguing, so it would qualify as an excited blutterance.
Alan Shore: Blutterance isn't even a word, much less a defense! You murdered someone over a fake word!
-Alan Shore (James Spader) Boston Legal
Alan Shore: Blutterance isn't even a word, much less a defense! You murdered someone over a fake word!
-Alan Shore (James Spader) Boston Legal
by k80theshade March 3, 2009
Get the blutterance mug.(1)masturbating While a stick of dynamites fuse is slowly burning down and you put it out with your load if you dont finish in time you die .
(2) masturbating while riding a rocket.
(3) masturbating while riding a motorcycle
(2) masturbating while riding a rocket.
(3) masturbating while riding a motorcycle
(man one) brah i just heard the news did he really die?(man 2) didn't you hear kooterz died while blaster-bating.(at least he died doing what he loved the dynamite finally beat his por ass) (man one) damn
by c3000b1atch35 April 25, 2010
Get the blaster-bating mug.