when there is a visible piece of food stuck in between your teeth and could end up in an embarrasing state for you.
by Lewis Murphy November 23, 2007
by Freybjorg April 17, 2020
Someone who commits to hangout with his friends only to duck out on them and ditch them for something way less cool.
Eddie: Hey do you want to hang out Wednesday?
Chris: Sure, I will definitely be there Pri!
(Two Days Later)
Chris: Yo, I need to duck, I have to watch Obama's speech
Eddie: Man, you are such a ducker!
Chris: Sure, I will definitely be there Pri!
(Two Days Later)
Chris: Yo, I need to duck, I have to watch Obama's speech
Eddie: Man, you are such a ducker!
by Primary April 21, 2009
by Jake January 07, 2005
A person that repeatidly goes AFK in the middle of an instant message conversation without letting you know they are away from the computer.
by RevMB April 22, 2008
by Jpgesus March 10, 2015
A rather large stone used as a form of primative weaponary. So named as when thrown it requires one to crouch down or as the term goes 'to duck.'
'Ducking' was primarily considered the best form of defence against such attack until, as a species, we became more intelligent and in fact 'running' is now considered much more effective. This may be for two reasons; 1.) Attackers were becoming more wise to such 'ducking' and therefore proceeded to throw the 'ducker at a lower level, causing many injuries to the back of the head and back. 2.) If running is achieved at a credible pace it limits the possibility of secondary or multiple attacks. Whereas with the primary defence, 'ducking' there was almost always potential for secondary or even multiple ensuing attacks, unless with some luck, the attacker runs out of such ammunition. In which case, usually the 'attacker' then becomes 'defendee.'
Thus, my opinion is that the name of this here weaponary be changed in fact to 'a Runner.' Although I admit, it does not have quite the same ring to it, nor would it prevoke the same sense of fear when used as verbal in attack.
'Ducking' was primarily considered the best form of defence against such attack until, as a species, we became more intelligent and in fact 'running' is now considered much more effective. This may be for two reasons; 1.) Attackers were becoming more wise to such 'ducking' and therefore proceeded to throw the 'ducker at a lower level, causing many injuries to the back of the head and back. 2.) If running is achieved at a credible pace it limits the possibility of secondary or multiple attacks. Whereas with the primary defence, 'ducking' there was almost always potential for secondary or even multiple ensuing attacks, unless with some luck, the attacker runs out of such ammunition. In which case, usually the 'attacker' then becomes 'defendee.'
Thus, my opinion is that the name of this here weaponary be changed in fact to 'a Runner.' Although I admit, it does not have quite the same ring to it, nor would it prevoke the same sense of fear when used as verbal in attack.
E.g. Dave: 'I'm gonna come over there and knock you out.'
Rob (picking up a rather large stone): 'Come on then!'
Marv, friend of Dave: 'Oh shit, he's gunna lob a ducker.'
Dave: 'Fuck it, run!'
Rob (picking up a rather large stone): 'Come on then!'
Marv, friend of Dave: 'Oh shit, he's gunna lob a ducker.'
Dave: 'Fuck it, run!'
by Davo Van Dangerous November 06, 2009