You want to know why Jordan Peterson doesn't
like the red pill? Yeah? Ok. Here's why Jordan Peterson doesn't
like the red pill. Here's why he called them weasels, and then later dialed it back. Here's why there's some crossover between the fanbases. (Just in case I
haven't explained this before)
Hym "So Jordan's proposition is basically this: Women are attracted to this higher-order abstraction. The 'Competent
man.' And it's not easy for women to tell the difference between competent men and imposters. The Weasels, on the otherhand, have a similar belief. The higher-order abstraction is the 'High-value
man.' And the high-value
man is this amalgam of traits including height, income, bigfatcock, and 'mInDsEt'(Which is essentially Jordan Peterson 'Competent
man' abstraction. Which is where the crossover occurs). I call him the 'Imanginary Frankenstein.' But the problem lies in the Redpill's conceptualization of women. Women who have these qualities (all 3 of which apply to his daughter) engage in 'hook-up culture,' Single mothers, and divorcee are all considered 'low-value women.' MY ASSERTION is that women
will settle for ANY traits that exists on the Imanginary Frankenstein or any combination of traits, starting with
money (at a correlation of .7).
Money makes up the largest slice of of the
pie-graph and is
like the torso of the Frankenstein. Bigfatcock is (obviously) the big fat cock. And you can rank-order the traits hierarchically like so:
Money|
Fatcock
|
General Attractiveness
|
And your fuckin ✌️✊️✌️Mindset✌️✊️✌️
Or whatever. But THIS 👇
Fatcock
|
Money|
GA|
And-so-on
This ☝️ Is critical fatcock theory. This is what we're here to prove. I'm a serious academic."