Neutrosemitism/neutrosemitic is the neutral point between prosemitism and antisemiticm, and: not having or endeavouring to manifest a position of prosemitism or antisemitism, or any spelling variant inferring those; rather, it is having and endeavouring to manifest a NEUTRAL position in respect of those things and being able to engage in discourse from an empirical ‘
humanity’ perspective
The distinction is needed in response to dubious casting of
people and organisations as antisemitic, and the threat to ‘pick a side’,
even to the mere spectre of the topic.
Previously, English language has polarised the topic by only having
words in the vernacular for the pro- and anti- extremes. Empirically, that has manifested in many
people, organisations and Gov’ts being dubiously accused as antisemitic unless they apologetically and obsequiously back effectively Zionistic doctrine. Such
even implied accusation of antisemitism doesn’
t merely imply affront felt or feigned by the accuser, NO, it infers that the accused has broadly affronted all Jews, and Jewish culture, and all Jewish power/position/money/business/political and societal interests - the whole Hive, the centre of which is Zionistic doctrine, irrespective of moderates
English left little-to-no room for the neutrosemitic to engage in civil discourse on the topic without being compelled to take a position at one of the
hard-line extremes, and empirically,
anything other than prosemitic got dubiously labelled antisemitic
