Neutrosemitism/neutrosemitic is the neutral point between prosemitism and antisemiticm, and: not having or endeavouring to manifest a position of prosemitism or
antisemitism, or any spelling variant inferring those; rather, it is having and endeavouring to manifest a NEUTRAL position in respect of those things and being able to engage in discourse from an empirical ‘humanity’ perspective
The distinction is needed in response to dubious casting of people and organisations as
antisemitic, and the threat to ‘pick a side’, even to the mere spectre of the topic.
Previously,
English language has polarised the topic by only having words in the vernacular for the pro- and anti- extremes. Empirically, that has manifested in many people, organisations and Gov’ts being dubiously accused as
antisemitic unless they apologetically and obsequiously back effectively Zionistic doctrine. Such even implied accusation of antisemitism doesn’t merely imply affront felt or feigned by the accuser, NO, it infers that the accused has broadly affronted all Jews, and Jewish culture, and all Jewish power/position/money/business/political and societal interests - the whole Hive, the centre of which is Zionistic doctrine, irrespective of moderates
English left little-to-no room for the neutrosemitic to engage in civil discourse on the topic without being compelled to take a position at one of the hard-line extremes, and empirically, anything other than prosemitic got dubiously labelled
antisemitic
