Neutrosemitism/neutrosemitic is the neutral point between prosemitism and antisemiticm, and: not having or endeavouring to manifest a position of prosemitism or antisemitism, or any spelling variant inferring those; rather, it is having and endeavouring to manifest a NEUTRAL position in respect of those things and being able to engage in discourse from an empirical ‘humanity’ perspective
The distinction is needed in response to dubious casting of people and organisations as antisemitic, and the threat to ‘pick a side’, even to the mere spectre of the topic.
Previously, English language has polarised the topic by only having words in the vernacular for the pro- and anti- extremes. Empirically, that has manifested in many people, organisations and Gov’ts being dubiously accused as antisemitic unless they apologetically and obsequiously back effectively Zionistic doctrine. Such even implied accusation of antisemitism doesn’t merely imply affront felt or feigned by the accuser, NO, it infers that the accused has broadly affronted all Jews, and Jewish culture, and all Jewish power/position/money/business/political and societal interests - the whole Hive, the centre of which is Zionistic doctrine, irrespective of moderates
English left little-to-no room for the neutrosemitic to engage in civil discourse on the topic without being compelled to take a position at one of the hard-line extremes, and empirically, anything other than prosemitic got dubiously labelled antisemitic
The distinction is needed in response to dubious casting of people and organisations as antisemitic, and the threat to ‘pick a side’, even to the mere spectre of the topic.
Previously, English language has polarised the topic by only having words in the vernacular for the pro- and anti- extremes. Empirically, that has manifested in many people, organisations and Gov’ts being dubiously accused as antisemitic unless they apologetically and obsequiously back effectively Zionistic doctrine. Such even implied accusation of antisemitism doesn’t merely imply affront felt or feigned by the accuser, NO, it infers that the accused has broadly affronted all Jews, and Jewish culture, and all Jewish power/position/money/business/political and societal interests - the whole Hive, the centre of which is Zionistic doctrine, irrespective of moderates
English left little-to-no room for the neutrosemitic to engage in civil discourse on the topic without being compelled to take a position at one of the hard-line extremes, and empirically, anything other than prosemitic got dubiously labelled antisemitic
“Please, dude… STOP jewping me, I’m neutrosemitic.”
“If only everyone was neutrosemitic.”
“Advocate for neutrosemitism.”
“If only everyone was neutrosemitic.”
“Advocate for neutrosemitism.”
by BeReasonable May 22, 2024
Neutrosemitism, neutrosemitic is the neutral point between prosemitism and antisemiticm, and: not having or endeavouring to manifest a position of prosemitism or antisemitism, or any spelling variant inferring those; rather, it is having and endeavouring to manifest a NEUTRAL position in respect of those things and being able to engage in discourse from an empirical ‘humanity’ perspective.
The distinction is needed in response to dubious casting of people and organisations as antisemitic, and the threat to ‘pick a side’, even to the mere spectre of the topic.
Previously, English language has polarised the topic, only having words in the vernacular for the pro- and anti- extremes. Empirically, that has manifested in many people, organisations and Gov’ts being dubiously accused as antisemitic unless they apologetically and obsequiously back effectively Zionistic doctrine. Such even implied accusation of antisemitism doesn’t merely imply affront felt or feigned by the accuser, NO, it infers that the accused has broadly affronted all Jews, and Jewish culture, and all Jewish power/position/money/business/political and societal interests - the whole Hive, the centre of which is Zionistic doctrine, irrespective of moderates
English left little-to-no room for the neutrosemitic to engage in civil discourse on the topic without being compelled to take a position at one of the hard-line extremes, and empirically, anything other than prosemitic got dubiously labelled antisemitic
The distinction is needed in response to dubious casting of people and organisations as antisemitic, and the threat to ‘pick a side’, even to the mere spectre of the topic.
Previously, English language has polarised the topic, only having words in the vernacular for the pro- and anti- extremes. Empirically, that has manifested in many people, organisations and Gov’ts being dubiously accused as antisemitic unless they apologetically and obsequiously back effectively Zionistic doctrine. Such even implied accusation of antisemitism doesn’t merely imply affront felt or feigned by the accuser, NO, it infers that the accused has broadly affronted all Jews, and Jewish culture, and all Jewish power/position/money/business/political and societal interests - the whole Hive, the centre of which is Zionistic doctrine, irrespective of moderates
English left little-to-no room for the neutrosemitic to engage in civil discourse on the topic without being compelled to take a position at one of the hard-line extremes, and empirically, anything other than prosemitic got dubiously labelled antisemitic
"If only everyone was neutrosemitic."
"Advocate neutrosemitism."
"Please dude, STOP jewping me, I'm neutrosemitic."
"Calm down and appreciate that the word neutrosemitic is needed."
"Advocate neutrosemitism."
"Please dude, STOP jewping me, I'm neutrosemitic."
"Calm down and appreciate that the word neutrosemitic is needed."
by BeReasonable May 24, 2024
verb To deleteriously impact or subjugate by means of adverse connotations and stigma from concern regarding being dubiously cast as antisemitic, to enable the perpetrator to tactically gain or maintain power, position, assets and/or to vitiate others.
The word ‘jewpe’ calls out two aspects of malignant conduct by those dubiously accusing antisemitism: 1) motive is dubious; and 2) circumstances referred to “can deleteriously impact or subjugate”.
The word is not a slur or political statement.
Being dubiously inferred or accused antisemitic has egregious, vitiating effect; the ‘moral compass’ of the ‘dubiously’ accused is affected, compelling them towards obsequious and influenced conduct to avoid being so accused or promote a retraction, as they endeavour to mitigate compromise of their own interests. By extension, such-influenced conduct influences and threatens beyond individuals, to institutions, corporations & Gov’ts. It is tacit, insidious artifice, that infers broadly affronting all Jews and Jewish culture and all Jewish power, money, business, political&societal interests, in a miasma of concern/fear, inadequate English words to describe or respond to it, and evident compounding deleterious effect on Jewish reputation and those whose moral compass is dubiously compromised, influenced or interfered with. The word also protects civil Jewish folk from being besmirched in the World’s eyes, differentiating them from those engaging in such dubious, iniquitous conduct.
The word ‘jewpe’ calls out two aspects of malignant conduct by those dubiously accusing antisemitism: 1) motive is dubious; and 2) circumstances referred to “can deleteriously impact or subjugate”.
The word is not a slur or political statement.
Being dubiously inferred or accused antisemitic has egregious, vitiating effect; the ‘moral compass’ of the ‘dubiously’ accused is affected, compelling them towards obsequious and influenced conduct to avoid being so accused or promote a retraction, as they endeavour to mitigate compromise of their own interests. By extension, such-influenced conduct influences and threatens beyond individuals, to institutions, corporations & Gov’ts. It is tacit, insidious artifice, that infers broadly affronting all Jews and Jewish culture and all Jewish power, money, business, political&societal interests, in a miasma of concern/fear, inadequate English words to describe or respond to it, and evident compounding deleterious effect on Jewish reputation and those whose moral compass is dubiously compromised, influenced or interfered with. The word also protects civil Jewish folk from being besmirched in the World’s eyes, differentiating them from those engaging in such dubious, iniquitous conduct.
Once one can appreciate the nuances of what the verb to jewpe describes, from that single word, one's mind is so much more free and able to express what one already innately recognises - perspicacity, if you will, where for example one better sees who is juping who, and circumstances of it, and can engage in civil discourse regarding it, and even reflect on the manners and extent to which they themselves may have been directly or indirectly j*ped.
Stop jewping being foreign influence of Gov’t policy!
Stop jewping me!
Don’t be jewped!
Don’t jewpe yourself!
Don’t be jewped by yahoos!
Stop jewping being foreign influence of Gov’t policy!
jewpe: noun “One who/that has been jewped."
e.g. "Many people are collateral jewpes given the manner and extent elements of their Governments and media have been jewped."
jewpe: noun "The metaphorical ooze or foul odour from suspected jewping."
e.g. "OMG, the palpable and repugnant wash of jewpe-ooze from that politician's obsequious comment."
Stop jewping being foreign influence of Gov’t policy!
Stop jewping me!
Don’t be jewped!
Don’t jewpe yourself!
Don’t be jewped by yahoos!
Stop jewping being foreign influence of Gov’t policy!
jewpe: noun “One who/that has been jewped."
e.g. "Many people are collateral jewpes given the manner and extent elements of their Governments and media have been jewped."
jewpe: noun "The metaphorical ooze or foul odour from suspected jewping."
e.g. "OMG, the palpable and repugnant wash of jewpe-ooze from that politician's obsequious comment."
by BeReasonable May 24, 2024