4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially
harm its
future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of
Washington.
Hym "As far as the 4th factor: Does this harm the market for the original works I used? No. Everyone who's work I've used has been or had elevated politically or economically. The net worth of Urban
Dictionary increased by 800%. Jordan Peterson has ascended to
golden prophet of the right wing and gain millions of followers. Does this harm the market for my original work? Yes. It launders off all my
best ideas without giving me credit and the
AI companies does directly compete with me by using my revelations about AI to steal credit from me. Do I compete with Jordan Peterson? No. Because this isn't self help. It's self-immolation. An op-ed and autobiographical hypertext where I
muse on various propositions permeating the zeitgeist write skits and dialoue. Social, cultural, and political analysis. And
ANTI-HARASSMENT THAT MIRRORS THE DELUSIONS OF REFERENCE COMMONLY ASSOCIATED WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA ACTIVISM THROUGH PERFORMANCE ART. I also insult and threaten
people but only to draw attention and provoke action in regard to the continued surveillance, harassment, and theft I've been subjected to over the 10-
15 years and have said on several occasions not to do anything I haven't actually
done."
