batters box

Pertaining to the theoretical world of sexual bases; batters box refers to the pre-first base status of no titillating action.

She has never fondled with another person before; she is still in the batters box.

by Jesse M. Garcia August 23, 2008

ding batter

used in the "down east" community meaning tourist or some one not from around here

that yankee is a ding batter

by erin piner April 28, 2008

Border Batter

The condition whereby one experiences massive gastrointestinal explosions of gas and liqui-shit after consuming too much food from Taco Bell.

John made a run for the border with a late night Taco Bell visit. He paid the price the next day when the 4 bean burritos he ate came back out as Border Batter.

by Eaton Holgoode June 10, 2009

buttershoes

<adj> When describing a female, everything about her is appealing except for her shoes

(hot girl walks in)

Guy A: Oh oh oh! Her, mmm shes super fine...
Guy B: No shes not, shes a buttershoes
Guy A: A what?
Guy B: A buttershoes, everthing about her is hot 'but her shoes'
Guy A: oh oh...
Guy B: I'm depressed from now
Guy A: I think I'm gonna be sick..

by ukbajwa10 August 27, 2010

Venus Butterfly

The Venus Butterfly is a MANUAL sex act performed on a female. If you can get ORAL squeezed in there, too, then you are either magic or fucking Plasticman. First thing, the Venus Butterfly requires plenty of lube. Place splayed hands together and approach the vaginal area. Index fingers will surround the clitoris. Third and fourth fingers will enter the vaginal canal. Pinkies will either slide in the anus or fold out of the way (depending on your female's preference.) Gently open and close your hands. This will force your hands in and out of the orifices/ orifii? also appearing as a fluttering butterfly. It will take some practice to perfect, but you will be remembered and thanked upon achieving any measure of adeptness.

Although thought to be either simple g-spot stimulation, or oral sex, you must have the concentration and dexterity of a puppeteer to perform the Venus Butterfly.

by Bruno January 6, 2004

better living through chemistry

Used to be a slogan for DuPont (a chemical company), but now it refers to the practice of taking medication and/or drugs to make your life more enjoyable.

Becky: "Wow, Jenny was always so depressed, but now she takes a bottle of Prozac in the morning and washes it down with vodka, she seems really relaxed and happy."
Hank: "Oh, so she's discovered better living through chemistry!"

or

Slut: "Wow, your schlong is so hard!"
Old guy: "Yeah, I used to be impotent, but now I take Viagra. It's better living through chemistry..."

by jdawgzzz January 24, 2010

BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros

BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros (also known as Mr.Fink) are two atheist users on Wikipedia. They are self-professed scientists but with no qualifications, they are men who are ardent and delusional anti-theists with an inexplicable hatred towards religion and God (who they claim not to believe in so their hatred for him is illogical).

Both users stalk a certain selection of articles on Wikipedia (mainly the abiogenesis article) which they defend with aggressiveness and the view that their opinions and only their opinions are right. Both users are completely narrow minded and against views that disagree with their delusional beliefs.

For a self-professed biologist, BatteryIncluded doesn't understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Abiogenesis is a hypothesis that attempts to explain how life may have arose from non-living chemicals. Evolution is a scientific theory which explains how life evolved and the variation of species because of it. A person can hold evolution to be true but abiogenesis to be false. Honest researchers do not accept abiogenesis as factual because, unlike evolution, it has never been observed and has no empirical evidence. From a scientific perceptive, the actual origin of life remains a mystery still. The answer to the origins of life could very well be abiogenesis though and contrary to the views of BatteryIncluded, Apokryltaros and other extremist atheists, this doesn't refute God.

No natural process in existence refutes the concept of God since natural processes merely explain "how" and not "where" all matter and energy came from. Of course BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros get really really mad should you ask them to demonstrate their blind faith in the hypothetical magical atheist idea that universes can arise from nothing out of singularities that appear from nothing since it's evidenceless.

The Big Bang theory has presented a huge obstacle for these fools as it states the universe had a beginning. The two answers to its beginning is that it either arose from nothing (which is contrary to the principle of causality) or that it came from an unmoved eternal prime mover, i.e a god. So far, atheists have been unable to demonstrate or prove something from nothing and therefore their philosophy remains dead.

BatteryIncluded and Apokryltaros are examples of Wikipedians who use their editing privileges to censor other viewpoints and bully and harass users. They are quite often psychotic with their gibberish and are quite clearly giving out blow jobs to admins so that they don't get banned even when abusing the system of Wikipedia by closing talk page subjects as "soapboxes" whenever someone comes in and refutes their magical atheist belief that matter and energy can just "pop" into existence from nothing.

by Silly Atheists October 26, 2014