Lower middle class persons who day trip to the Jersey Shore. The origin of "shoe bee" goes back to the 1930's when day trippers from Philly would come down to the shore and carry their lunch in shoe boxes, as was common practice at the time
by Peter99 August 8, 2005
Get the shoe bee mug.by Roody September 7, 2005
Get the shoe size mug.Related Words
Shroe
• shroed
• shroeder
• shroeder bro
• Shroeterus
• Shoe Horn
• Shoe laces
• shoebox
• schroeder
• shmoes
A word for someone who sneaks into bedrooms at night and sniffs and/or steals shoes. They are not the same as shoe stalkers, but are very close. They are often non-violent. Apparently very popular in Cambridge, England.
by Laura PC March 12, 2007
Get the shoeblag mug.Flaccid penis + stubborn butthole + a thumb = Cincinnati Shoehorn.
1. the act of using one's thumb to assist in the insertion of a flaccid penis into a butthole.
2. East Portland Hipper than You-ing, except with a flaccid penis and a willing, non-hipster partner.
1. the act of using one's thumb to assist in the insertion of a flaccid penis into a butthole.
2. East Portland Hipper than You-ing, except with a flaccid penis and a willing, non-hipster partner.
James: Hey man, how was your night?
Paul: Well I had a little whiskey dick, so I had to start off with the Cincinnati Shoe Horn, but it got the job done.
James: Gross man.
Paul: Well I had a little whiskey dick, so I had to start off with the Cincinnati Shoe Horn, but it got the job done.
James: Gross man.
by NW PDXer January 10, 2012
Get the Cincinnati Shoe Horn mug.An Superior Iraqi weapon, only used 2 times yet. Deals double damage against Americans.
Shoe is also used for protecting feet and walking. There are many versions of shoe: boot, sandal, sneaker, flip-flop etc. Shoes always come in pairs.
Shoe is also used for protecting feet and walking. There are many versions of shoe: boot, sandal, sneaker, flip-flop etc. Shoes always come in pairs.
by Frosty The Wise January 8, 2009
Get the shoe mug.by Michael Ansel September 22, 2007
Get the shoeboxed mug.Is a cat in an isolated box that has a 50% chance of getting killed in the next hour due to a quantum event - such as a particle decaying with 50% chance, and which will release a poison that will kill the cat. If the particle does not decay, then cat will remain alive.
Schroedinger/Einstein claimed that after an hour with the box lid closed, the cat must be either dead or alive, each with 50% probability - this is just common sense. Bohr/Heisenberg claimed that with the lid closed, the cat is neither alive nor dead, but 50% alive AND 50% dead at the same time. That is the cat is in 2 mutually exclusive states at the same time!
Bohr's position is the "Principle of Superposition" and is central to quantum physics.
Empirical experments show that Bohr was correct, and Schroedinger wrong - up to a point. If the observer happens to be in the box, he will see what Schroedinger asserts. If the observer is out of the box and cannot see inside the box, then Bohr is right.
So Bohr and Schroedinger were both neither right nor wrong! What irony. The answer is "who is asking". Is the observer privy (entangled) with the cat or not. Note: this is unrelated to the popular concept that "the observer influences the observed". There is no influence by the observer.
Schroedinger/Einstein claimed that after an hour with the box lid closed, the cat must be either dead or alive, each with 50% probability - this is just common sense. Bohr/Heisenberg claimed that with the lid closed, the cat is neither alive nor dead, but 50% alive AND 50% dead at the same time. That is the cat is in 2 mutually exclusive states at the same time!
Bohr's position is the "Principle of Superposition" and is central to quantum physics.
Empirical experments show that Bohr was correct, and Schroedinger wrong - up to a point. If the observer happens to be in the box, he will see what Schroedinger asserts. If the observer is out of the box and cannot see inside the box, then Bohr is right.
So Bohr and Schroedinger were both neither right nor wrong! What irony. The answer is "who is asking". Is the observer privy (entangled) with the cat or not. Note: this is unrelated to the popular concept that "the observer influences the observed". There is no influence by the observer.
by Litwitquak January 11, 2008
Get the Schroedinger's Cat mug.