Hym "It's morality hinges entirely on whether or not you've adapted a set of axiomatic presuppositions that claims that the elements of the act is immoral. Religious morality dictates that it's entirely binary but in reality, how immoral is it? I mean, on a scale of -10 to 10 were would onlyfans land? Maybe a little exploitative of men's base desires but still
voluntary. The parasocial element could be considered
manipulative. But then you'd ALSO have to apply that to ALL online social media activity because they share those same elements. If you believe their's nothing wrong with women showing their body on
the internet it then it's fine on that end. Depending on whether or not they're being paid adequately for their labor it's either more or less exploitative than any other job. So, maybe somewhere between -2 and 2 on the morality scale. Fairly benign. It's fine. Cam girl shit is fine. I wouldn't do it because I'm not going to pay you to NOT fuck me but if people want to spend their money on it it's no more of a
waste of money than most online interactions with most social media entities."
