Average Wikipedia User

Noun; Chad
Noun; Me

Person1: LOOK! It’s an average Wikipedia user!
Person2: Sooo strong

Person1: Stop being gay Gerald.

by Average Wikipedia User May 9, 2022

wikipedia

Basically it's Urban Dictionary but with all the entries based around sex-realted slang replaced by intellectual thought. A good proportion of it may or may not be written by crazy people in caves who haven't seen sunlight in years, and as a result believe that "splinkard" is a real world.

"Do NOT quote wikipedia in your dissertation! It is not an academic source." Bloody useful though.

by Chris May 13, 2005

wikipedia

A website that REALLY pissed off the Chinese Communist Party, or simply the PARTY.

Wikipedia actually has more backbone than corporations like Microsoft, Google or Yahoo!.

by Peevee July 30, 2008

WIKIPEDIA

Acronym for We Illustrate Kinks Involving Phallocentric Euphoria During Intercourse. Awesome.

Man, check out this article on WIKIPEDIA

by captainhogfacehead October 16, 2009

wikipedant

wik-ee-ped-nt (n.)

1. a person who is excessively concerned with looking up minor details and rules on wikis (notably Wikipedia) or with displaying their internet-learning, esp. when it has just been learned.
2. a person who adheres rigidly to the content of wiki pages without regard to common sense.
3. a person who is v. ostentatious or condescending when engaged in the above behavior.

Other forms: wikipedantic (adj.), wikipedantry (n., an example of wikipedantic behavior)

The wikipedant was constantly on her phone, checking and correcting our ENTIRE conversation.

by Shaestorms May 1, 2014

Wikipeedofile

A person who uses nothing but Wikipedia to get their information.

- - Kimbo says:
Rodney Marsh is gonna be in "i'm a celebrity"

Thorag says:
Where did you find that out?

- - Kimbo says:
Wikipedia

Thorag says:
You're just a dirty little Wikipeedofile

- - Kimbo says:
:-

by ThoraG December 4, 2007

wikipedia

An online encyclopedia that was created using a socialist method of production. Nobody owns Wikipedia, and nobody sells it or profits monetarily from it. Eveyone contributes what they can, and everyone shares equally in the finished product.

Wikipedia currently has over 200,000 articles.

Wikipedia and other GNU projects are proof of the power of socialism to accomplish what capitalism can't.

by John February 22, 2004