Someone kicking the bucket by accidental suicide or just because their kids would be even more lame than they were. Darwinicide.
by fitchfingers July 16, 2011
Get the darwinicide mug.by CaliforniaBoy656 May 11, 2016
Get the Daltino mug.Related Words
dalwin
• Dalwina
• Dalwinder
• darwins
• Dallin
• darwin awards
• dalin
• Darwin Nunez
• Darwinism
• Dalina
Darwin project or sometimes known as just Darwin is an underrated game made by blizzard. It is on Xbox, play station and windows for free. This game is like a combination of Fortnite and Minecraft where you craft armour, axes, traps and many more. There are 16 in a lobby with a host that give advantages to the losing players. If you don't want to play then you can host a game
by flipping dog March 24, 2020
Get the Darwin project mug.The act of shitposting in groupchats with the intention of angering someone for shits and giggles. The shitposts tend to be memes gathered from all corners of the Internet (mainly 4chan) and personal insults. These posts usually hold a message to targeted person/people.
Person1:Hey Liam can you stop Darwinposting right now, we are trying to talk about school.
Liam: Fuck school, go dropout like your druggie brother.
Liam: Fuck school, go dropout like your druggie brother.
by Mimikrios April 4, 2020
Get the Darwinposting mug.Easily the best running back Minnesota has had since Adrian Peterson left town
Draft this man in the first round ALWAYS
Draft this man in the first round ALWAYS
My dad passed on Dalvin Cook in the first round to get Mahomes. Not bad, but you could have had DALVIN
by ChexManiac September 11, 2021
Get the Dalvin Cook mug.Dalking is the art form of dating and talking at the same time, but you do not have the official term of dating just yet.
Did you know that Roshanudo and J-Qwon were dalking?
Aw, Fo' Real, that sucks we was just dalking last week!
Aw, Fo' Real, that sucks we was just dalking last week!
by The Notorious B October 7, 2009
Get the Dalking mug.darwin, charles was a alcoholic man with suicide inclinations, a huge white barb and a amateur interest for the nature. Inspired by his 33th grade freemason grandfather, erasmus darwin, the absurd theories of malthus and other primitive inanities, he considered his theory of evolution, by natural selection, which is scientifically collapsed today. (But with a simple research, you can find some idiots who still do believe in darwinism: dawkins, stephen jay gould, douglas futuyma, ...
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
This "theory of evolution by natural selection" gave rise to doubts from the very first:
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
by darwinism refuted April 14, 2009
Get the darwin mug.