1. To copy and paste information on Wikipedia, constantly frowned upon by educators.
2. To look up information to shut down an argument.
3. To be acknowledged on Wikipedia, usually boosting one's social stats.
2. To look up information to shut down an argument.
3. To be acknowledged on Wikipedia, usually boosting one's social stats.
1. 'Jack, did you copy and paste from Wikipedia? I will be contacting your mother regarding this.'
2. 'Shawn Mendez was NOT born in Canada,', Conan exclaimed when suddenly, Jack pulled his MyPhone ECKS Wikipediaed it, 'Lookie here, he was born in TORONTO, boi.'
3. 9/11 was Wikipediaed about quite a while afterwards.
2. 'Shawn Mendez was NOT born in Canada,', Conan exclaimed when suddenly, Jack pulled his MyPhone ECKS Wikipediaed it, 'Lookie here, he was born in TORONTO, boi.'
3. 9/11 was Wikipediaed about quite a while afterwards.
by The Canadian Textbook December 20, 2017
ahh, Wikipedia is the savior of students everywhere. wikipedia is the source of every middle school paper that was done at 11:59 to turn in at 12:00
by The 1 who speaks the truth December 02, 2022
by random guy online69420 January 14, 2022
By the people, but not necessarily for the people. Attempts to define and explain everything, ideally without writing a book on every topic.
Has the same issues as any other democracy or a place, with group majorities - tribalism and its cultural influence: A place were simps, feminists, bitches, are making their tribal biases/opinions 'scientific', while linking what is pretty much their own blog's shitposts for sources; and nerds are trying to make their hobby/area of expertise articles as unreadable as possible for a commoner.
Has a tendency of throwing you into a rabbit whole of information, when you've already forgotten your initial question and have ended up reading articles on ancient Chinese schools of thought for no reason.
Has the same issues as any other democracy or a place, with group majorities - tribalism and its cultural influence: A place were simps, feminists, bitches, are making their tribal biases/opinions 'scientific', while linking what is pretty much their own blog's shitposts for sources; and nerds are trying to make their hobby/area of expertise articles as unreadable as possible for a commoner.
Has a tendency of throwing you into a rabbit whole of information, when you've already forgotten your initial question and have ended up reading articles on ancient Chinese schools of thought for no reason.
I disagree with that wikipedia article, so I've edited the definition to be a more 'objective representation of reality'. Also I'm undoing all the edits that disagree with me, my majority will prevail!
I'm wikipedia-eductated.
I'm wikipedia-eductated.
by veinsofgold June 01, 2022
Teacher: Now class I want you to research The 1663 war. This is due on Monday submit by 12 am. Please don't do this last minute and use Wikipedia.
Me on Sunday 11:55 pm: Right so the 1663 war happened in 2015 I Antarctica. Makes sense thanks Wikipedia.
Me on Sunday 11:55 pm: Right so the 1663 war happened in 2015 I Antarctica. Makes sense thanks Wikipedia.
by AreYouReadingMyName March 01, 2021
the source of all knowledge
by rustyshackleford August 02, 2007
I wanted to know what oral sex was, but I thought going on urban dictionary seemed too usual, because most of thier definetions probably would not help me. If I want it detailed, I will go to wikipedia.
by DizzyLizzy January 26, 2007