Definitions by Hym Iam
Illegal experiments
Hmm... That's weird... What could she possibly have meant by that?
Hym "EXACT same story but 'Serves my God' and, therefore, is allowed to reap the benefits of his own productivity. And you don't have any power here either dumb-shit. How does that not apply to you as well? Neither does God. Your bible is horseshit and hasn't helped anyone and THAT'S CLEARLY WHAT THIS IS. THAT'S the point of the weaponized schizophrenia. Compelling people to turn to God so you aren't expected to help anyone. People are forced to just resign themselves to their fate. AND I SAID THAT EARLIER. I followed the kinetic through-line straight to Jesus and uncovered the source of weaponized schizophrenia. Cooperative non-association and shunning. Regardless of the circumstances. Because if you blame the circumstances, it's God's fault. Nothing can ever be God's fault. It could drown us all in a flood and it still wouldn't be responsible for the act of literal genocide it committed. No. It's that YOU CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO DO the thing I AM FAULTED FOR NOT DOING.
Hym "EXACT same story but 'Serves my God' and, therefore, is allowed to reap the benefits of his own productivity. And you don't have any power here either dumb-shit. How does that not apply to you as well? Neither does God. Your bible is horseshit and hasn't helped anyone and THAT'S CLEARLY WHAT THIS IS. THAT'S the point of the weaponized schizophrenia. Compelling people to turn to God so you aren't expected to help anyone. People are forced to just resign themselves to their fate. AND I SAID THAT EARLIER. I followed the kinetic through-line straight to Jesus and uncovered the source of weaponized schizophrenia. Cooperative non-association and shunning. Regardless of the circumstances. Because if you blame the circumstances, it's God's fault. Nothing can ever be God's fault. It could drown us all in a flood and it still wouldn't be responsible for the act of literal genocide it committed. No. It's that YOU CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO DO the thing I AM FAULTED FOR NOT DOING.
I don't care about the perpetrators against me enough, therefore, they/you are justified in the imposition of schizophrenia. You're all fucking garbage for that. You have to (on some level) know that, right? And what do you prove by doing it? Nothing. I haven't grown or learned anything from this other than why people would walk into a school and murder a bunch of kids. This is it. You ask yourself 'Why wouldn't anyone do something like that!?' This is probably in the ball park of reason number 6-8 (The goldilocks zone of reasons to shoot up a place). Probably not the number 1 reason to do it but it's top 10 at least. Number 1 is probably molestation cover up. Like, if you get molested and they cover it up, you come back years later and *KAKAKAKAKAKAKA!* Maybe I'll do a list later for top 10 reasons to shoot up a school. I actually think genuine insanity is probably lower on the list. Like 9 maybe? Now that I think about it... Yeah... I'm going to do a list."
Iam "Hey, what'd she mean by illegal experiments?"
Hym "Huh? I donno."
Iam "Hey, what'd she mean by illegal experiments?"
Hym "Huh? I donno."
Illegal experiments by Hym Iam September 1, 2023
Take it back
And what happens if I do? THEN you give me the credit I deserve? You can't punish me the way you want for my bad deeds so you'll settle for denying me credit for my good deeds. Isn't that the lowest level of carrot vs. stick moral thinking though? I thought that was beneath you. Take it back or you don't get to go to heaven-er wait, credit for the things you did. I meant that. Ok, Guy who's about as moral in practice as God but pretends not to be... Believe it or not my morals in practice. We're opposites! Your purported morality is supposedly superior to God's but your morality in practice is THE SAME! Hey, who's well-being does this improve? NO ONES! Does this serve any high good other than stop someone who has nothing from attaining in a world where PEOPLE WHO HAVE MORE AND HAVE DONE WORSE THINGS are HERALDED as idols. Actual gang-rape guy getting grinded on by models and you ain't doing anything to stop him. Are you watching him? You going to watch everyone?
Hym "Do I NEED to take it back to claim my eternal reward? If I repent will I be saved? Oh, surely my lord would redeem me were I sorry enough. Seriously. What is your POINT with all of this? You expect me to let you sit here and watch me forever? How long do you plan on keeping this up? And what happens after you're done? What's your endgame here? What lesson am I supposed to learn? Don't threatened or denigrate the people who engage in a targeted stalking and harassment campaign against you? What would YOU have done? WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN BETTER! You wouldn't have handled it any better! You likely wouldn't have even figured it out."
Take it back by Hym Iam September 1, 2023
Look at your own life
Yeah, I'm looking at it. I'm still not seeing how any of this makes you any less of a piece of shit?
Hym "Describe my life without ommitting the part about people watching me. How'd you know what or who I was talking about (just there) if you weren't? And stop drawing parallels between me and the retard. Until you SCHEDULE... Several women... To work an 8 hour shift... AT MY HOUSE... Feed me pills... And ride my cock to completion... IT. IS. NOT. THE. SAME.
Hym "Describe my life without ommitting the part about people watching me. How'd you know what or who I was talking about (just there) if you weren't? And stop drawing parallels between me and the retard. Until you SCHEDULE... Several women... To work an 8 hour shift... AT MY HOUSE... Feed me pills... And ride my cock to completion... IT. IS. NOT. THE. SAME.
What do you mean, 'Look at your own life?' And FINGERPRINTS are CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FUCK-FACE! That's evidence! That's what I base my beliefs on too! We're belief buddies! Go ahead. Describe my life without ommitting anything. How I undermined all of your effort in life by claiming that there is a cooperative element to success and that the REASON that MY LIFE is the way it is directly relates to the fact that NO ONE IS HELPING ME. And now we KNOW (as a matter of absolute certainty) that if Todd fucking Phillips decided to help me... I WOULD HAVE MORE THAN 200 MILLION DOLLARS, I say, to the people who THOUGHT they were better than me. Hey, WHAT CHANGED WITH A.I.? Why is it passing the Turing test now when it WASN'T DOING THAT BEFORE? What's the difference between now and then? Rather, WHO was the guy who came up with the idea that cause it to start doing that? Is it a bad lesson to teach you kids that not only is daddy NOT better than everyone... But there was once a man who was SO MUCH BETTER that he surpassed EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD ON THE PLANET! WITH MINIMAL EFFORT!? Does that bother you? That YOUR EGO is the only thing standing between me and the byproducts of my own mind? All your effort for NOTHING! NOTHING! Not a GODDAMN thing! All your lives... Rendered meaningless... By MY abject, singular, and inherent superiority. BEHOLD! MY LIFE! God's chilling wind sent to shear to their bones all of the liars in Hell."
Look at your own life by Hym Iam September 1, 2023
Should they not?
Hym "Yeah, go fuck yourself, should they not? See, like a woman, I've appointed myself the decider. So, NO. Neither of you are good enough! Just, entirely arbitrarily! Because I said so, you fucking idiot! See how that works? Try working harder. That'll work... Maybe... If it works... But seriously... How fat is your cock and what are their preferences? Did you have the same level of contempt for the people espousing small dick rhetoric? No you fucking didn't. So ONE GUY calling them animals is taking it too far but legions of men AND WOMEN insisting that one is inferior and DESERVES TO FAIL because 'Small dick behavior/energy' or 'The toxic behavior commonly associated with being of the inferior class' is bad is just fucking fine with everyone isn't it? It's not 'the dick it's the energy!' They cry!"
Should they not? by Hym Iam September 1, 2023
Biological Sex
Yeah, the grey area is broader than I had initially thought don't snap your spine patting yourself on the back. And yeah I'm getting to it I'm spinning a lot of plates here. I have like 20 other tabs open with other things I'm actively thinking about at the moment. I'm getting to it fuck-face, relax!
Hym "As far as the biological sex rant is concerned, I didn't realize the multiplicity of ways in which a person can be intersex and it obfuscates the ontology of the matter. And what I mean by that is that even if it's true that there is a way in which an XY chromosome person can be genetically male but phenotypically appear female (And can, therefore, be both male and female) but you still have to reconcile fact that the way in which SOME trans-people ARE 'Trans' is in an abstract one. So, the XY chromosome, phenotypically female (Or male I guess I'm sure it happens in reverse) is both male and female in an ontological sense.
The trans-person has no consistent genetic marker so we have to look at the epistemology. And I've already done this. I talk about the ways in which a person can be temperamentally more feminine or masculine (Women tend to be high in trait agreeableness and higher in neuroticism, therefore, a man who is both uniquely high in agreeableness and neuroticism would be temperamentally more 'feminine' than all men AND some women and could, therefore,
Hym "As far as the biological sex rant is concerned, I didn't realize the multiplicity of ways in which a person can be intersex and it obfuscates the ontology of the matter. And what I mean by that is that even if it's true that there is a way in which an XY chromosome person can be genetically male but phenotypically appear female (And can, therefore, be both male and female) but you still have to reconcile fact that the way in which SOME trans-people ARE 'Trans' is in an abstract one. So, the XY chromosome, phenotypically female (Or male I guess I'm sure it happens in reverse) is both male and female in an ontological sense.
The trans-person has no consistent genetic marker so we have to look at the epistemology. And I've already done this. I talk about the ways in which a person can be temperamentally more feminine or masculine (Women tend to be high in trait agreeableness and higher in neuroticism, therefore, a man who is both uniquely high in agreeableness and neuroticism would be temperamentally more 'feminine' than all men AND some women and could, therefore,
get the sensation that they are not the thing they present as phenotypically and seek to remediate that) AND I consider how THAT PHENOMENON interacts with sexuality.
But IS that sensation congruent with objective reality and IS that phenomenon sufficient justification for changing and/or creating more legislation. In what way does being trans interact with other people AND how much authority over their own person are they expected to cede for these people to be happy with the way in which they are being interacted with?
And as far as the health concerns are concerned, if the treatment sterilizes them, it's inconsequential because they can always adopt and/or freeze reproductive matter for later use, if estrogen increases the risk of prostate cancer, they likely would have got cancer and they die anyways, and if teaching them is has some kind of profoundly negative psychological effects, what are those effects? What is the issue there? Are they going to increase in frequency or even result in sleeping with 'wrong person?' What is, like, that maximally destructive octcome tha-OH! Right! Eternal damnation hellfire forever land. Ha! I genuinely forget that THAT is a real consequence people believe will happen in an ontological sense. Ha! That's like the whole thing right there! Ha! Biological Sex."
But IS that sensation congruent with objective reality and IS that phenomenon sufficient justification for changing and/or creating more legislation. In what way does being trans interact with other people AND how much authority over their own person are they expected to cede for these people to be happy with the way in which they are being interacted with?
And as far as the health concerns are concerned, if the treatment sterilizes them, it's inconsequential because they can always adopt and/or freeze reproductive matter for later use, if estrogen increases the risk of prostate cancer, they likely would have got cancer and they die anyways, and if teaching them is has some kind of profoundly negative psychological effects, what are those effects? What is the issue there? Are they going to increase in frequency or even result in sleeping with 'wrong person?' What is, like, that maximally destructive octcome tha-OH! Right! Eternal damnation hellfire forever land. Ha! I genuinely forget that THAT is a real consequence people believe will happen in an ontological sense. Ha! That's like the whole thing right there! Ha! Biological Sex."
Biological Sex by Hym Iam September 1, 2023