Hym Iam's definitions

Screenwriters

Oh? Does that suck? You worked hard but my thing is the best thing ever written of it's kind and I DIDN'T have to work hard? Wow! It's kind of like someone fucked a retard instead of you... You know? Like... Figuratively... That sucks for you... Enjoy not getting paid enough or AT ALL for your contribution. I wouldn't know what that's like because I'm not allowed to exist and (therefore) nothing can or is happening to me.

Hym "Yeah, that sucks about the screenwriters getting paid more than 0 dollars to do a less good job than me and then ignoring my existence because I refuse to tow a partisan and/or ideological lines. Like... They bitch about denying trans people's existence but here they are denying someone's existence.... A little hypocritical... Just saying..."

by Hym Iam June 2, 2023

Compelled

People DON'T ACTUALLY NEED TO BE COMPELLED to play "the trans-gender game." People seem perfectly willing to play along. YOU would need to be compelled for YOU to play... But they really didn't need to compel anyone to get these people to go along with it.

Hym "And 'the children' are your excuse to sacrifice my finite (for all you know) and solipsistic existence to your higher-order abstraction. You also accept the NEED for compulsion (of psychopaths). Is society destined to fail because it requires the use of compulsion? I mean, your claim is 'if people need to be compelled that is evidence that what you're doing isn't sustainable.' If that's the case, society isn't an 'iterable game' by your own logic.

by Hym Iam June 2, 2023

Self-conscious thought

They load on to the same circuits as negative emotion! So they're the same thing!

Hym "Which is a ridiculous thing to say... It's like saying '2 Broke Girls is on the same channel as Young Sheldon! They're functionally the same show! They wouldn't be on the same channel if they weren't the same show!' and that's ridiculous. Preposterous even! So, self-conscious thoughts are still not the same as negative emotion but it would be convenient for you for people to view thinking about themselves as a negative thing."

by Hym Iam June 2, 2023

YoU hAvE tO pIcK a SiDe!

NOW CHOOSE! Group of evil retards A OR Group of evil retards B

Hym "Iam! YoU hAvE tO pIcK a SiDe! Group of evil retards A OR Group of evil retards B. Pick one."

Iam "What? Uuuuum... I don't know man... What's the difference?"

Hym "Welp, Group of evil retards A are a bunch of solipsistic narcissists who think you're inferior to them along moral and ideological lines (Unless you do what they want). Group of evil retards B (On the other hand) are narcissists who are all (kind of) trapped in their own solipsistic experience. AND they think they're superior to you along ideological and moral lines (Unless you do what they want)."

Iam 'Uuuuh, I'm not seeing a-"

Hym "YoU hAvE tO pIcK a SiDe!"

Iam "Ok! Um.. A-Er, no, B! B."

Hym 😱 "You digusting, racist freak! B!? You're clearly an evil retard."

Iam 😟 "Wha- You made me pick- How did race get involved?"

Hym "YOU WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO PICK THE EVIL RETARDED ONE!"

Iam "EVIL AND RETARDED WERE MY ONLY OPTIONS!"

Hym "WRONG! Wrong choice!"

Iam "I- How? So YOU picked A?"

Hym "What!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I'm the greatest mind who's ever lived! I literally rival Shakespeare! Why would I be an evil retard!?BWAHAHAHAHAHA!"

Iam "Well I... You said I HAD to choose!"

Hym "AND YOU COULDN'T EVEN DO THAT RIGHT! AAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"

by Hym Iam June 4, 2023

Religious Text

What it would look like... If you got rid of all of the world's religious texts... And then introduced the Bible... To the people who didn't know anything about the Bible... And asked them if it "felt like God"... Is a thing that has already happened... Because there is a time that predates the Bible... And it WAS introduced to the people that existed (at that time)... And they were like... "Yeah, it does seem like there is a thing that makes people act collectively (to commit genocide sometimes) and can be cruel and arbitrary and make your existence torment (seemingly with intent) and, like, make a bunch of kids die at the same time n' stuff"... That happened... And now here we are... Now you say "Well, replicate the experiment. Wipe the board and do it again. Would it be the exact same thing?" And it's like: I don't know there might be some recurring themes. They would all boil down to the same basic proposition: "A thing" that consists (at least in some small part) of a will that is not your own makes reality occur around you and can act with intent "against" or "for" you and the nature of your existence is entirely dictated by your interaction with this thing and it can either be arbitrarily dope or horrific... or a mixture of both...

Hym "Ohohohoho... You wish to challenge the Demigod of the conceptual realm!? The first prophet of the digital age!? Very well filth pig... Ok,

you know what I always thought was stupid? I think it was Hitchens quoting somebody saying (and I'm paraphrasing) 'The only way to get someone to commit an atrocity and think it's good is by way of religion' and it's stupid because isn't not impossible... for an atrocity to have happened... Before the advent of religion... If you conceptualize an act and then commit the act, you MUST (on some level) view that act as 'Good' or at the very least justifiable. So, why would you need external validation from a God to conceptualize an act as'Good', commit the act, and maintain that the act was 'Good'? It seems backwards. Like saying pre-religious text atrocities (like killing other tribes) where conceptualized as 'Bad', acted out in spite of the fact that they were conceptualized as 'A bad thing to do', and it wasn't until somebody came along and said 'Nonono guys it's fine. There's a magical reality monster that WANTS us to do things like this so.... We're good. That's fine.' Why would anyone think committing an atrocity think they were wrong if the were willing to commit an atrocity to completion. You don't need God to commit atrocities. Monkeys commit 'atrocities' and absent of God why would they do it if not 'feeling as though they should do it in the absence of reason?' Because Monkey can't reason. Monkey only 'feel as though they should do things.' You would need a revelation AFTERWARDS. You would need to do the thing you conceptualized doing and realize that it was 'Bad'.

by Hym Iam June 5, 2023

Soul

Yeah, you saw it too? The gaping chasm of semantic-space he expects people to fall into? You see it? But I appreciate you saying that though.

Hym "Nah, you know that by 'Soul' I mean 'The energy that powers your Meat-Gundam and leaves your body when you die. Can't be created or destroyed. Comprises your thoughts.' It's also interesting to consider the process by which new ideas are inseminated. Like the idea of a "God." Where did the idea come from in a pre-God world? The concept of a God was (at one point in human history) was not stored in a single human brain. It has to come from somewhere, doesn't it? So, how does electricity traveling through the brain create an abstraction to store within the meat-jelly for later recollection?

I would posit that the information is ALREADY stored within the 'energy' and the brain acts as an extraction tool. That the energy itself informs our brain just as much as sensory data and that our goal in understanding consciousness should be finding a way to decode/unlock/translate this information. So, for clarity, I'll give you an example: Say I think of an apple. You could scan my brain and see the areas of my brain light up. If you were to find a way to externally stimulate the exact same parts of the brain; would you be able to make me think of an apple against my will? Now, I'm not talking about a feeling (like "can you stimulate my brain into feeling afraid?") Does 'apple' exist in the part of the brain being stimulated and can you access it externally? Will ANY electric current stimulating the EXACT same parts of the brain create the same imaginary apple that exists in my mind right now? Does the mind inform the mind by way of electrical signal or does the electrical signal inform the mind? Is the part of my brain that houses the concept of 'Apple' sending a signal to the part of the brain that conceptualizes 'Apple' OR is the act... of 'thinking of apple' generating this electrical current... that IS 'apple'? You follow? I don't know I'm running out of characters. It's something to consider, I guess... Or rubbish. Either way... Yeah... That's what I mean by soul."

by Hym Iam June 11, 2023

Brains

Speaking of brains...

Hym "Speaking of 'brains'... Mine isn't feeling very good right now Mr. Audience. So, in case I don't get the chance later, I'm going to do the last one now and then even if it's not the last one then you will know that chronologically that this one is supposed to be the last one. Alright? Fantastic! Ok. Here we go. The last one ever but not actually, just, you know, chronology. Ok."

by Hym Iam June 11, 2023