Meaningless drivel. Things like “goal” or “shared vision.” And the assertion that you need these things is conjecture promulgated as fact.
Dr. Jordan Baalenciaga PeepPorp “You can only feel positive emotion in relationship to a goal”
Hym “This a prime example of Jordan Peterson (in the words of Brandon Shiff) stating conjecture as fact. See, he knows he’s doing it and he knows that it’s wrong for him to do it but he’s just going to keep doing it. Because right and wrong don’t matter to Jordan Peterson. The only thing that matters to Jordan Peterson is the preservation of his own will. Which is why he’s so obsessed with not being manipulated. YOUR will (on the other hand) is irrelevant. What you believe is irrelevant (to Dr. Jordan Peterson). And it’s demonstrably untrue. What about the weekend, Jordan? Was it my ‘goal’ to not work for a couple of days? No. But I feel positive emotion none the less. How about finding 20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. Positive emotion? Yes. Was it my goal to find money on the sidewalk? No.”
Dr. Qwertyuiop asdfghjkl “Anyone can find the exception!”
Dr. Jordan Baalenciaga PeepPorp “You can only feel positive emotion in relationship to a goal”
Hym “This a prime example of Jordan Peterson (in the words of Brandon Shiff) stating conjecture as fact. See, he knows he’s doing it and he knows that it’s wrong for him to do it but he’s just going to keep doing it. Because right and wrong don’t matter to Jordan Peterson. The only thing that matters to Jordan Peterson is the preservation of his own will. Which is why he’s so obsessed with not being manipulated. YOUR will (on the other hand) is irrelevant. What you believe is irrelevant (to Dr. Jordan Peterson). And it’s demonstrably untrue. What about the weekend, Jordan? Was it my ‘goal’ to not work for a couple of days? No. But I feel positive emotion none the less. How about finding 20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. Positive emotion? Yes. Was it my goal to find money on the sidewalk? No.”
Dr. Qwertyuiop asdfghjkl “Anyone can find the exception!”
Hym “It’s not that there’s AN exception. It’s that that are so many exceptions that it makes it impossible for what you’re saying to be true. It’s the same with your ‘shared vision’ nonsense. You use these vague, amorphous terms to disguise the sophistry. How is a ‘shared vision’ and different from a ‘predictive model?’ I’m referring (of course) to your argument about climate change. This ‘share vision’ is not only unnecessary but it doesn’t really mean anything. And what happened to ‘not doing things that you know to be wrong and stupid?’ That’s what you do. It isn’t for you. Your entire propositional ethic is what is convenient for OTHER PEOPLE to do so that YOU don’t have to deal with them. OOHHH!!! 😱 That’s what this is! It’s YOU getting out of having to do therapy! That’s YOUR goal. Therapy was miserable and depressing for you because of how tragic people’s lives are, and now you don’t have to do it. You can ‘help people’ (who don’t actually need help) by promulgating your flawed ethic (that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny) and get that sweet, sweet positive emotion without having to do things you don’t want to do. Which is the definition of ‘moving towards a goal’ by the way. Doing things you don’t want to do. THAT IS HILARIOUS! HA! That’s the point of your buzzword psychology. Rendering therapy obsolete through sophistry.”
Dr. Gargamel Potara “You can’t think so accept my propositions and die quietly regardless of the outcome!”
Dr. Gargamel Potara “You can’t think so accept my propositions and die quietly regardless of the outcome!”
by Hym Iam December 06, 2022
Get the Buzzword Psychologymug. I am not a schizophrenic.
Hym "Really. And it has to be clear to the audience here that you don't even care whether or not I'm a schizophrenic. Seriously, if you seriously think that you assholes democratizing mental illness is a good idea, I can't wait for it to bite you retards in the ass. It likely already has. I'm still waiting on the score. Really, all of the shit you supposedly care about is MAKE BELIEVE. And if I'm not willing to play along I'm some variation of 'the wrong type of person' and the value of my life reduces to an integer. What's you're justification? Well, I said that the value of your life could be represented as an integer. Uno reverse. It literally 1 of the only 2 things you're capable of mentally."
by Hym Iam April 02, 2024
Get the Schizophrenicmug. You mean... The incels? Is that👈 THAT ☝️? The weak men? The cause of all the worlds problems? If only they were listening to you better everything would be fine? Is that what you mean?
Hym "Here we have it kiddos! This is 'How we solve the Single Men Crisis (according to the public discourse around the matter)' in several points. You ready? Ok. Here we go.
Step 1: NEVER engage with the 'Single men' publicly or directly. They are to be postured about from afar by people who are disproportionately successful in the dating market and/or women.
Step 2: The discourse should be hyper-fixated on getting men into long-term committed relationships while ignoring the fact (entirely) that the DEFAULT social interaction between women and the dating market is hook-up culture. That's the DEFAULT.(God I wish I had a way to make a diagram here.... Shit.) So, the goal is to find a way to get men to bypass (entirely) the 1st order dating pool and enter the smaller, ancillary dating pool of people seeking long-term committed relationships. Which women are not currently doing. They're not entering the ancillary dating pool until they are in their 30's and satisfied with their career. So we have to pretend this dichotomy between the 1st and 2nd order dating pools does not exist at all costs.
Hym "Here we have it kiddos! This is 'How we solve the Single Men Crisis (according to the public discourse around the matter)' in several points. You ready? Ok. Here we go.
Step 1: NEVER engage with the 'Single men' publicly or directly. They are to be postured about from afar by people who are disproportionately successful in the dating market and/or women.
Step 2: The discourse should be hyper-fixated on getting men into long-term committed relationships while ignoring the fact (entirely) that the DEFAULT social interaction between women and the dating market is hook-up culture. That's the DEFAULT.(God I wish I had a way to make a diagram here.... Shit.) So, the goal is to find a way to get men to bypass (entirely) the 1st order dating pool and enter the smaller, ancillary dating pool of people seeking long-term committed relationships. Which women are not currently doing. They're not entering the ancillary dating pool until they are in their 30's and satisfied with their career. So we have to pretend this dichotomy between the 1st and 2nd order dating pools does not exist at all costs.
Step 3: We need to obfuscate the causes of disparate outcomes with abstract and sophistical vaguery. It's not 'disparities in general attractiveness, transactional interactions, and fat cocks = outcome' it's ' "The Work" = Outcome.' And if you do 'The work' you will get NOT the outcome of moving into the 1st order dating pool. You'll get a DIFFERENT outcome. You'll get into the ancillary dating pool and that will go however it happens to go.
Step 4: We really have to drive home the fact that this HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMEN. Women are not complicit, culpable, or even a variable in the disparities in success. If more men were like the men who are CURRENTLY disproportionately successful... Then those NEW and IMPROVED men... Would do THE OPPOSITE of what the CURRENTLY SUCCESSFUL men are doing... And have long-term relationships with the women... Because... Reasons... Pft! That's the solution to these fucking idiots! Make the bad men like the good men... And then expect the NEW good men... To do, NOT what the current good men are doing, but rather, something else entirely. That's the fucking solution to the single men crisis. There you go guys. Problem solved!"
Step 4: We really have to drive home the fact that this HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMEN. Women are not complicit, culpable, or even a variable in the disparities in success. If more men were like the men who are CURRENTLY disproportionately successful... Then those NEW and IMPROVED men... Would do THE OPPOSITE of what the CURRENTLY SUCCESSFUL men are doing... And have long-term relationships with the women... Because... Reasons... Pft! That's the solution to these fucking idiots! Make the bad men like the good men... And then expect the NEW good men... To do, NOT what the current good men are doing, but rather, something else entirely. That's the fucking solution to the single men crisis. There you go guys. Problem solved!"
by Hym Iam October 01, 2023
Get the Single Men Crisismug. Hym "Hey have you ever seen Jordan shill for mens rights? No! I can literally say that I haven't seen that EVER... Not a single time... and that's God's honestly truth. But wait... Then why is he heralded as the King of the incels? And I don't appreciate the insinuation that I wouldn't call your daughter a slut to you face insulting. And you act like I don't have people covertly calling me names 24/7. Shit, I'd call her a slut to the back of her head... bent over an arm rest... But that's neither here nor there. I'm no coward but if I acted that way I'd be in some kind of retard group home. In which case you would be totally justified in bringing women to come suck my dick."
by Hym Iam February 23, 2023
Get the Shillmug. Not to be confused with "Immoral", A moral means "Absent of morals or moral reason". In the same way that "Atheist" means the "absence of religious belief".
Iam "Ok. I noticed that it seems to be the case that people vary in terms of what governs their behavior in the context of Freudian Psychology. How do I frame this properly?.... So... Let's start with the concept of a person's 'Drive'. You have your temperamental proclivities and these proclivities 'drive' your behavior (to whatever extent). In Freudian Psychology you have the Id (Instinct) Ego (Reality) Superego (Morality) and all people have these aspects within them. But to what degree are people 'Driven' by these different aspects of Psychology? Because it clearly varies. And how does it relate to their temperament in the context of the 'Big 5 personality traits'? So if you put all 3 on a scale like this
<Id------------Ego----------Superego>
1☝️ 2☝️
What causes someone to end up at point '1' I'm terms of their 'drive' as opposed to point '2'? So conscientious people tend to be conservative and conservatives tend to be religious. But not all religious people are priest. People higher in openness a usually liberal. Liberals seem less likely to be religious. But not all liberals are activist types. It seems as the activists are more heavily driven by Superego than non-activists. You could even say the radical types are more heavily driven by Superego (which is why the Social Justice movement is likened to a sort of faux religion). What is the cause for this and what causes someone to be 'Amoral' or more ID driven (for example hedonistic types)? Is it socialization?"
<Id------------Ego----------Superego>
1☝️ 2☝️
What causes someone to end up at point '1' I'm terms of their 'drive' as opposed to point '2'? So conscientious people tend to be conservative and conservatives tend to be religious. But not all religious people are priest. People higher in openness a usually liberal. Liberals seem less likely to be religious. But not all liberals are activist types. It seems as the activists are more heavily driven by Superego than non-activists. You could even say the radical types are more heavily driven by Superego (which is why the Social Justice movement is likened to a sort of faux religion). What is the cause for this and what causes someone to be 'Amoral' or more ID driven (for example hedonistic types)? Is it socialization?"
by Hym Iam May 12, 2022
Get the Amoralmug. That's what this seems to be about for you. Bill C-16 gives your students a degree of arbitrary social leverage that you weren't willing to afford them.
Hym "Hey, I really didn't use your work for a whole lot initially. I was saying back then what YOU are saying NOW because I was going though the thing that you are actively doing now. I had no recourse. I had no way of defending myself. I didn't even have the vocabulary to defend myself. The only tool I had to defend myself because I WAS (and still am) going though what you ARE going though. And I'm not allowed to use it because IT'S AGAINST THE RULES. And then I started critiquing it. And that's my REAL crime. It's like the chicken and the grasshopper. See, the chicken had a theory. And he thought his theory couldn't be contended with. Unfortunately for the chicken, there was a fatal flaw. You see, in the same way that there are two classes of fear, there are two classes of genius. And the grasshopper is both. So, like the brilliant deconstructionist that he is, the grasshopper began to contend with those uncontendwithable ideas. Jokingly at first. The chicken was enraged. His shining golden-god moment was sullied by the grasshopper.
Hym "Hey, I really didn't use your work for a whole lot initially. I was saying back then what YOU are saying NOW because I was going though the thing that you are actively doing now. I had no recourse. I had no way of defending myself. I didn't even have the vocabulary to defend myself. The only tool I had to defend myself because I WAS (and still am) going though what you ARE going though. And I'm not allowed to use it because IT'S AGAINST THE RULES. And then I started critiquing it. And that's my REAL crime. It's like the chicken and the grasshopper. See, the chicken had a theory. And he thought his theory couldn't be contended with. Unfortunately for the chicken, there was a fatal flaw. You see, in the same way that there are two classes of fear, there are two classes of genius. And the grasshopper is both. So, like the brilliant deconstructionist that he is, the grasshopper began to contend with those uncontendwithable ideas. Jokingly at first. The chicken was enraged. His shining golden-god moment was sullied by the grasshopper.
And then the grasshopper began to posit HIS OWN IDEAS. And what's more, everyone loved it. They didn't just love it. It was objectively brilliant. Poetry and prose the likes of which the world had never seen. Comedy skits, philosophy, theology, social psychology. Literally billions of dollars worth of ideas. And not just quality but quantity as well. An untapped wellspring of new ideas. Some speculation. From conceptual arms deal to archetypal hero (and villian sometimes) over night.... and shit, I'm running out of characters.... Long story short, the grasshopper is now technically one of the greatest writer's all time and I forgot to use the words 'social leverage'. Shit. I went off half cocked here. I'll come back to it.
by Hym Iam January 12, 2023
Get the Social leveragemug. Oops! The drone missed and killed a bunch of children. Oops! The alarm didn't go off and killed a bunch of children. Oops! We keep agreeing to a ceasefire but the drones just kill killing people. Oops! Someone canceled the weapons shipment to Russia and nobody knows who's responsible. Oops! Oops!
Hym "Oops! Error! Accidental drone strike in Gaza accidentally doesn't kill terrorists and instead kills kids. OOPSIES!"
by Hym Iam July 13, 2025
Get the Errormug.