Definitions by Hym Iam
Dick Dawkins
Hym "You see what happened the other day witj Jordan Peterson? He just said that "The Atheists have no good arguments' and then he brings up Dick Dawkins. Right? Dick Dawkins was asked by Alex O'Connor the other day 'Which is the most competent religious debater?' And Dawkins' response was 'I don't think there are any.' You see what he (Jordan Peterson) did there, right? He's just saying the opposite of what Dick Dawkins said! He does it to me too. Destiny kind of alludes to it in their interview. He just says the opposite of whatever anyone says about the religion. I say 'God is a Psychopathic Narcissist' and now he says 'The protesters are psychopathic narcissist!' Dick Dawkins says 'No good argument for God'Jordan just SAYS THE FUCKING OPPOSITE OF THE WORDS THAT WERE SAID, DAWG! Do you believe that shit!? That's his new thing now. And then he bring up Dick Dawkins not 2 seconds later. Which makes what he's doing even less subtle. He just says the fucking opposite of what people say, just, completely arbitrarily."
Dick Dawkins by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
Piracy
I mean, if you're doing it instrumentally as economic warfare on ideological enemies then the initial piracy is justified. I don't know what kind of politics creatives have. Rouroni Kenshin writer got got for child porn. I watched Drake and Josh growing up. I was funding that molester by watching the show!
Hym "If the goal of consumption is to manufacture sucess on the basis of social values then piracy is not only justified but literally the only option. You shouldn't be paying for any entertainment media because you have no idea what any of them are actually doing. Piracy should even be a crime. What, you're going to fine me for being selective with who I support?"
2+2=4 does not=2+2=4
Inter-subjectively
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."
2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
Are you talking about me?
Hym "That's exactly what it is you smug fuck. You're perpetually trying to get me to pull you finger so you can fart in my face you fucking prick. 'ArE yOu TaLkInG aBoUt Me?' You think I don't fucking know that? Don't you think I already know exactly who that would go?"
Are you talking about me? by Hym Iam May 30, 2024
Art
No... This is art. This is a form of social nude modeling and blatant taboo violation as performance art. The point of it a little obfuscated but if you read it long enough you can kind of get the bigger picture and it's fun for the audience because they kind of get to pick the taboos I violate themselves! You know? It's like you purport to have a taboo! I'm like a sexy lady obfuscated by fog... Sexy no Justu! Oiroke no Jutsu!
Therapy
A corrupt practice that does nothing but placate the masses with a sordid past that's filled with malpractice and malfeasance.
Public figure
Hym "If you are a 'public figure' then you occupy a PUBLIC space and if it's a public space I have a right to occupy it as well. You don't give a fuck about the rights of corporations... Except for the corporations that allow you to sit on your ass and work 2 fucking hours a day while mocking me and allowing the people you claim to hate to profit off of something that doesn't belong to them."
Public figure by Hym Iam May 30, 2024