A bias where one applies rigorous proof standards only to claims they disagree with, while accepting weak or no evidence for claims they favor. Selective proof bias is the hallmark of motivated reasoning: the same person who demands double‑blind studies for acupuncture will accept anecdotal testimonials for their preferred supplement; who insists on “proof of harm” for environmental regulations will accept speculation about economic benefits. The bias lies not in the standards themselves but in their inconsistent application.
Example: “He rejected climate models as ‘unproven’ but accepted a single op‑ed as proof that deregulation boosts growth. Selective proof bias: rigor for opponents, credulity for allies.”
by Dumu The Void March 29, 2026
Get the Selective Proof Bias mug.