A production manager that's red in the face, hungover or drunk and hates women, children and animals.
Hey man, the production manager is miserable and is clutching his liver. Should we call an ambulance? No need, he's just a Johnny 5.
by Adam Harrington April 17, 2025

That’s the amount of people who have a dick that is 6 inches or bigger! That’s the exact percentage! It’s that fat cocks! What do we do about it!? Definitely not kill them all... that would be bad and wrong... like trying to impose schizophrenia on someone... stealing all their ideas... 🤔 What could we do? Hmmm.... You know my vote is going to glory whole brothels... that would fix the problem....
Hym “HA! 5%! That’s another one! There I go! Being RIGHT again. Game? Not real! Love! Not real! There is only fat cocks and not-fat cocks... or sign this contract and don’t cheat on me or you don’t get to take half of my money and you burn forever.... or shut up and wear the Hijab bitch or eat rocks... I shouldn’t talk like that. Because I’m also talking about the daughter I don’t have who would be put in direct danger by the thing you’re doing to me and won’t stop because I won’t be the one who pays the price for what you’re doing... and the fact that it would be worse to have a son because no one will care about his life and if he doesn’t buy a permanent whore and/or have a fat cock he will live as a slave and die alone... Hmm... What could we possibly do... Curiouser and curiouser....” 🤔
by Hym Iam November 28, 2022

this time⌛
i watch frm the sidelines
ur ghost in the limelight
Face ur fears
&Pierce the night
5:27 Renkse,Linder
i watch frm the sidelines
ur ghost in the limelight
Face ur fears
&Pierce the night
5:27 Renkse,Linder
by Bobbert665 December 22, 2024

by baddestrock4lifer March 23, 2022

A word no one’s ever thought of before. This happens when you press each letter, number and punctuation mark on the keyboard without pressing the Shift key to reveal the numbers on the number line and then using the Shift key you type the special symbols instead of the numbers.
Me: “Let’s see what words we haven’t typed into Urban Dictionary yet. Have we typed qazqazwsxwsxedcedcrfvrfvtgbtgbyhnyhnujmujmikikololpp?”
Daryl: “Yes, this word is already there.”
Me: “So let’s think of another word. Qawzsexdrcftvgybhunjimkolpqawzsexdrcftvgybhunjimkolp, this word has even more sex than anyone’s ever seen”
Daryl: “Yeah. I would type `~1!2@3#4$5%6^7&8*9(0)-_=+qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpP{}aAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlL;:'"\|zZxXcCvVbBnNmM,<.>/? instead.”
Daryl: “Yes, this word is already there.”
Me: “So let’s think of another word. Qawzsexdrcftvgybhunjimkolpqawzsexdrcftvgybhunjimkolp, this word has even more sex than anyone’s ever seen”
Daryl: “Yeah. I would type `~1!2@3#4$5%6^7&8*9(0)-_=+qQwWeErRtTyYuUiIoOpP{}aAsSdDfFgGhHjJkKlL;:'"\|zZxXcCvVbBnNmM,<.>/? instead.”
by bluestinger66 August 17, 2023

This is an amended version of the 1-4 scale. This scale removes almost all subjectivity from measuring your attraction to someone. Posts on this site have done their best to set out this scale, but this is the definitive, amended version.
The Basic 1-4 Scale (as already noted by Howie440):
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would.
2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would.
3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't.
4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
A New Addition (the 1-5 scale):
5. I would, I can't see why anyone wouldn't, and I'll be happy if I can just get with them.
Amendments & clarifications:
i) Who can really be considered a 4? - To avoid any subjectivity, keep in mind that: if everyone in the group says they're a 3, they're a 4. This is because if everyone calls them a 3, then everyone would and, therefore they're a 4.
ii) The 5 - More of a theoretical idea than a reality. The 5 is someone whom you would be completely satisfied to get with (make out with) once and never see again. They are so attractive to you that you would happily take the one opportunity and never try to talk to them again.
However - this means that if you do try to talk to, message, or get with them again, they are now by default a 4.
iii) It should also be noted that much like how any 4 must already be an agreed 3, any 5 must already be an agreed 4. This is continuous scale.
The Basic 1-4 Scale (as already noted by Howie440):
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would.
2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would.
3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't.
4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
A New Addition (the 1-5 scale):
5. I would, I can't see why anyone wouldn't, and I'll be happy if I can just get with them.
Amendments & clarifications:
i) Who can really be considered a 4? - To avoid any subjectivity, keep in mind that: if everyone in the group says they're a 3, they're a 4. This is because if everyone calls them a 3, then everyone would and, therefore they're a 4.
ii) The 5 - More of a theoretical idea than a reality. The 5 is someone whom you would be completely satisfied to get with (make out with) once and never see again. They are so attractive to you that you would happily take the one opportunity and never try to talk to them again.
However - this means that if you do try to talk to, message, or get with them again, they are now by default a 4.
iii) It should also be noted that much like how any 4 must already be an agreed 3, any 5 must already be an agreed 4. This is continuous scale.
Me: "Hey, how was the club last night?"
Roommate: "Pretty good, I met someone."
Me: "Nice, good looking?"
Roommate: "I'd say 8/10."
Me: "How am I meant to know what that means, use the 1-5 scale."
Roommate: "Oh like a solid 3."
Me: "Glad to hear it mate."
Roommate: "Pretty good, I met someone."
Me: "Nice, good looking?"
Roommate: "I'd say 8/10."
Me: "How am I meant to know what that means, use the 1-5 scale."
Roommate: "Oh like a solid 3."
Me: "Glad to hear it mate."
by yourwelcome03 February 6, 2022
