Vaginoskepsis is derived from the term Omphaloskepsis, which is the contemplation of one's navel as an aid to meditation. Vaginoskepsis is therefor the contemplation of one's vagina.
Omphaloskepsis comes from Greek omphalos (navel) + skepsis (act of looking, examination). Contemporary use of the word is usually made in jest, as "navel-gazing" is more commonly associated with being self-absorbed or involved in pursuits primarily fueled by egotism.
In this vein, Vaginoskepsis refers to being vaginally egocentric. A vaginoskeptic person, typically female and identifying with feminist thought, evaluates the world and the merits of matters in terms that relate to the vagina - more broadly, in terms relating to sex and gender roles, misogyny, and evaluating everything for its potential to sleight or repress females. Particularly vaginoskeptic persons will find ways to infer offense to any given thing, regardless of its actually being misogynistic.
Omphaloskepsis comes from Greek omphalos (navel) + skepsis (act of looking, examination). Contemporary use of the word is usually made in jest, as "navel-gazing" is more commonly associated with being self-absorbed or involved in pursuits primarily fueled by egotism.
In this vein, Vaginoskepsis refers to being vaginally egocentric. A vaginoskeptic person, typically female and identifying with feminist thought, evaluates the world and the merits of matters in terms that relate to the vagina - more broadly, in terms relating to sex and gender roles, misogyny, and evaluating everything for its potential to sleight or repress females. Particularly vaginoskeptic persons will find ways to infer offense to any given thing, regardless of its actually being misogynistic.
Anita Sarkeesian's vaginoskepsis is so pervasive in her work, she could spin eating a taco into a crass victimization of women, making Mexican food the wife-beater of international cuisine.
by gadiv June 04, 2013
Foreplay technique, performed by inserting one's hand or fist into a partner's anus and rectum, to the wrist, then inquiring as to what time it is.
Rob performed The Rusty Watch on Kathleen, pushing his hand betwixt her buttocks to his wrist, then asked of her the time of day, to which she cordially responded "Ohhh - it's ... it's like 2:30 or something... mmm."
by gadiv January 21, 2009
Foreplay technique, performed by inserting one's hand or fist into a partner's anus and rectum, to the wrist, then inquiring as to what time it is.
Rob performed The Rusty Watch on Kathleen, pushing his hand betwixt her buttocks to his wrist, then asked of her the time of day, to which she cordially responded "Ohhh - it's ... it's like 2:30 or something... mmm."
by gadiv January 18, 2009
Pronunciation Key (YOO-ni-tee)
iadj./i
1. Of or pertaining to the unit (a.k.a. "penis")
2. Likened, as in by reference, to the unit (a.k.a. "penis")
iadj./i
1. Of or pertaining to the unit (a.k.a. "penis")
2. Likened, as in by reference, to the unit (a.k.a. "penis")
by gadiv August 06, 2006
Freestalling in practice:
(A phat beat plays.)
Rap Artist: YEAH, BOY...
(Rap Artist moves with rhythm and determination.)
Rap Artist: UH-HUH...
(Rap Artist performs urban gesticulations to get into his creative flow.)
Rap Artist: YEAH, WHAT ... WHAT ...
(Rap Artist is finding difficulty arranging words into profound lyrics.)
Rap Artist: UHHHHHH....
(A phat beat continues to play in hopes of dope rhymes.)
(A phat beat plays.)
Rap Artist: YEAH, BOY...
(Rap Artist moves with rhythm and determination.)
Rap Artist: UH-HUH...
(Rap Artist performs urban gesticulations to get into his creative flow.)
Rap Artist: YEAH, WHAT ... WHAT ...
(Rap Artist is finding difficulty arranging words into profound lyrics.)
Rap Artist: UHHHHHH....
(A phat beat continues to play in hopes of dope rhymes.)
by gadiv August 12, 2010
The love of knowledge and the love of seeking it, then producing exhaustive writings of exhausting and inept metaphors, being refuted by another philosopher's exhausting and inept metaphors, then replying in rebuttal to challengers, ad nauseum. While one of the most noble intellectual pursuits, it is also one of the most masturbatory.
Summa Philosophia: Key Figures in Philosophy, Summarized in 500 Words or Less
Nietzsche = Woot, but mighta had bad thoughts about family members.
Socrates = Straight up gangsta, dat nigga drank any drank put in frunna him.
Plato = Overrated heir apparent of Socrates that screwed up Science for more than a thousand years with First Principles and other useless crap.
Aristotle = Reincarnated some time later into Gene Wilder.
Aquinas = Justified Catholic bullshit from a very comfy chair.
Confucius = Had the same PR agent as Jesus and gets all sorts of cool stuff attributed to him.
Augustine = Converted to Christianity early enough that he was one of the religion's editors - he gave you the God you "know" now by stealing heavily from Plato.
Descartes = Brought intellectualism to new highs and degrees of convolution by rationalizing things instead of pulling new crazy shit out of his ass.
Kant = Changed Minds. No, really - he changed them from being viewed as a cup that sorta just fills up with experiences into a filter and interpreter of sensory data. A computer rather than a trashcan.
Kierkegaard = Brought angst to the forefront of philosophy and did ultimately dehumanizing things that lead to quantifying peoples' lives in terms like "The Average Person spends 1/3rd of his Life Asleep" and other damning, mope-infested whinings about escapism and wasting time. Waste of Time? Kierkegaard.
Lao Tzu = The Asian Sensation. Tao De Ching is a quick read with little novel and even useful tidbits. Like a compilation of fortune cookie fortunes, but better.
John Locke = Shared a few basic principles with Kant. The mind is a house furnished with experiences and sensory input.
Karl Marx = History is the record of class conflict, material interests, and the exchange and exploitation involving them. Philosophy should not just interpret the world, but shape it.
Pascal = Somehow made the first mechanical calculator at age 15 in 1642. Beat that, fuckers. Sadly, he abandoned supermathgenius for philosophy, probably shooting all of humanity in the foot in the process, but he at least contributed to scientific investigation.
Spinoza = Ultimately just another dude that desperately needs God to exist in some fashion, but wrote avidly of ethics and against traditional religious views. Interest in his writing persists in modern environmentalists and ecologists.
Hume = Related the mind in terms of perception (impressions), processing and memory (idea). Like a bunch of other dudes. It was inevitable, really, but thanks for getting your papers in on time. ;D
Leibniz = Desperately tried to resolve The Problem of Evil so that God could be both Omnipotent and Benevolent at the same time and totally looked retarded for it. Voltaire totally burned him in Candide for it.
The ultimate lesson of Philosophy that you will never find in these old dead guys' writing is this: You utilize what is useful and discard what is not. No one has the answer and if someone somehow did, no one else would believe it or realize it. Walk your own way and try not to step on other peoples' toes. Wear comfortable shoes. Bring water.
Nietzsche = Woot, but mighta had bad thoughts about family members.
Socrates = Straight up gangsta, dat nigga drank any drank put in frunna him.
Plato = Overrated heir apparent of Socrates that screwed up Science for more than a thousand years with First Principles and other useless crap.
Aristotle = Reincarnated some time later into Gene Wilder.
Aquinas = Justified Catholic bullshit from a very comfy chair.
Confucius = Had the same PR agent as Jesus and gets all sorts of cool stuff attributed to him.
Augustine = Converted to Christianity early enough that he was one of the religion's editors - he gave you the God you "know" now by stealing heavily from Plato.
Descartes = Brought intellectualism to new highs and degrees of convolution by rationalizing things instead of pulling new crazy shit out of his ass.
Kant = Changed Minds. No, really - he changed them from being viewed as a cup that sorta just fills up with experiences into a filter and interpreter of sensory data. A computer rather than a trashcan.
Kierkegaard = Brought angst to the forefront of philosophy and did ultimately dehumanizing things that lead to quantifying peoples' lives in terms like "The Average Person spends 1/3rd of his Life Asleep" and other damning, mope-infested whinings about escapism and wasting time. Waste of Time? Kierkegaard.
Lao Tzu = The Asian Sensation. Tao De Ching is a quick read with little novel and even useful tidbits. Like a compilation of fortune cookie fortunes, but better.
John Locke = Shared a few basic principles with Kant. The mind is a house furnished with experiences and sensory input.
Karl Marx = History is the record of class conflict, material interests, and the exchange and exploitation involving them. Philosophy should not just interpret the world, but shape it.
Pascal = Somehow made the first mechanical calculator at age 15 in 1642. Beat that, fuckers. Sadly, he abandoned supermathgenius for philosophy, probably shooting all of humanity in the foot in the process, but he at least contributed to scientific investigation.
Spinoza = Ultimately just another dude that desperately needs God to exist in some fashion, but wrote avidly of ethics and against traditional religious views. Interest in his writing persists in modern environmentalists and ecologists.
Hume = Related the mind in terms of perception (impressions), processing and memory (idea). Like a bunch of other dudes. It was inevitable, really, but thanks for getting your papers in on time. ;D
Leibniz = Desperately tried to resolve The Problem of Evil so that God could be both Omnipotent and Benevolent at the same time and totally looked retarded for it. Voltaire totally burned him in Candide for it.
The ultimate lesson of Philosophy that you will never find in these old dead guys' writing is this: You utilize what is useful and discard what is not. No one has the answer and if someone somehow did, no one else would believe it or realize it. Walk your own way and try not to step on other peoples' toes. Wear comfortable shoes. Bring water.
by gadiv January 09, 2009
ne·ol·o·jism
Pronunciation nee-ol-uh-jiz-uhm
noun
1. a new word, meaning, usage, or phrase that was coined unnecessarily, probably in a juvenile effort to coin a term for the sake of coining the term.
2. the introduction or use of useless, clumsy new words or poorly conceived alternative senses of existing words.
3. a new doctrine, esp. a new interpretation of sacred writings, in which one acquires sexy results.
4. (Psychiatry.) a gush of new words, often consisting of combinations of other words and gibberish, that is understood only by the speaker: occurring most often in the speech of schizophrenics and drunken fraternity members.
-Related Forms
ne-ol-o-jizz, verb
ne·ol·o·jist, noun
ne·ol·o·jis·tic, ne·ol·o·jis·ti·cal, adjective
Pronunciation nee-ol-uh-jiz-uhm
noun
1. a new word, meaning, usage, or phrase that was coined unnecessarily, probably in a juvenile effort to coin a term for the sake of coining the term.
2. the introduction or use of useless, clumsy new words or poorly conceived alternative senses of existing words.
3. a new doctrine, esp. a new interpretation of sacred writings, in which one acquires sexy results.
4. (Psychiatry.) a gush of new words, often consisting of combinations of other words and gibberish, that is understood only by the speaker: occurring most often in the speech of schizophrenics and drunken fraternity members.
-Related Forms
ne-ol-o-jizz, verb
ne·ol·o·jist, noun
ne·ol·o·jis·tic, ne·ol·o·jis·ti·cal, adjective
Rather than providing examples of the usage of the word neolojism in a sentence, it will perhaps be more useful to provide examples of neolojisms in the wild. For example, "convergasm" is an ill-conceived portmanteau of "converse" and "orgasm" that fails to be both useful and amusing. The same can be said of "conversatanist" and "discuntled", though only the latter example could ever see reasonable use among losers.
On the other hand, "plumplex" is an example of a neolojism that makes no sense in addition to being useless, and it suffers additionally due to its marked lack of intuitive grace. The term "spreebz" is merely goddamned retarded and should have been rejected by the editors.
Overall, more than 60% of all of the Urban Dictionary will be neolojisms, with 20% of that number being passably amusing.
On the other hand, "plumplex" is an example of a neolojism that makes no sense in addition to being useless, and it suffers additionally due to its marked lack of intuitive grace. The term "spreebz" is merely goddamned retarded and should have been rejected by the editors.
Overall, more than 60% of all of the Urban Dictionary will be neolojisms, with 20% of that number being passably amusing.
by gadiv December 03, 2008