A highly overrated, oversized NU METAL (not death metal or anything, you dumb assholes) band consisting of 9 douchebags who wear masks and jumpsuits as part of their gimmick, which they copied from Gwar.
Although not the worst band in the world, and one of the better nu metal bands out there, they definitely aren't worthy of being called "the best band" in any other context other than having to do with nu metal. They can't even hold a candle to real metal bands such as OLD-SCHOOL Metallica or Iron Maiden.
They have 9 members in the band, which is far too many. They have this many as part of the marketing gimmick. Proof of this is in the fact that you can't even hear half the members most of the time. The members evaluations are as follows:
Vocals: Not too bad honestly. Can sing a lot better than other nu metal singers like that fag from Korn, Johnathan Davis. Lyrics aren't too bad either but can suck, like the ones that one guy posted. Those are some seriously lame lyrics ("Now take a real good look at/What you've fucking done to me").
Guitar #1: Sucks. Typical, boring nu metal riffs. But still better than those in Disturbed, etc. No solos either.
Guitar #2: See above.
Bass: So hard to hear and so hard to like.... Sucks.
Drums (regular set): The best member along with the singer. Not too bad really but there are better. He at least does fills and SOME double bass. DEFINITELY not the fastest double basser either (listen to Dying Fetus, Kataklysm or Deicide for some REAL fast double bass). I hate him the least.
Drums (tom kit): What exactly is the point of this when all he does is play the same notes on the toms as the regular drummer does? Fuck off!
Drums (trashcan): Can this guy not afford a real drum set? Can he not play one? Apparently not. This guy is equally as ponitless as the tom drummer. You can actually hear his drumming but he only plays like 4 notes per song. The rest of the time he just stands there like a dumbass.
Sampler: What the fuck does he do as well? You hear NOTHING from this asshole! Even if you could he would suck. Die!
DJ (Scratches): Don't make me laugh.
So if 2 out of 9 members are decent, how good could the band overall be?
Oh, but wait! The material! More or less up to one's opinion but generally revolves around, "I'm a victim. I'm very angry and/or hurt. I hate you. Feel sorry for me." Nothing complex in the arrangements and maybe some creativity.
Fans of Slipknots label themselves as "maggots", a very fitting term. These "maggots" usually think they're badass rebels by listening to this band which offends their rich, uptight parents and are amongst the typical mallcore scene. I would never label myself a "maggot" if I were a fan of any band but these guys seem to be proud of it.
Despite what many say, Slipknot is featured to a limited degree on mainstream metal, mostly material from their latest release, which is much safer than their older stuff.
Overall, not the worst band, especially in nu metal, but very overrated. You know it can't be THAT good when kids wearing baggy cargo pants with a million pockets, hooded sweat jackets covered in grease stains, studded wristbands and wallet chains listen to it. But easily better than the likes of Korn.
P.S. Maggots, please stop telling us that we suck or to go fuck ourselves because we don't listen to the same "badass" mallcore band that you listen to. Also, we do not dislike/hate Slipknot because they're mainstream. That has nothing to do with them. We dislike/hate them because they're not that good/just fucking suck!
Although not the worst band in the world, and one of the better nu metal bands out there, they definitely aren't worthy of being called "the best band" in any other context other than having to do with nu metal. They can't even hold a candle to real metal bands such as OLD-SCHOOL Metallica or Iron Maiden.
They have 9 members in the band, which is far too many. They have this many as part of the marketing gimmick. Proof of this is in the fact that you can't even hear half the members most of the time. The members evaluations are as follows:
Vocals: Not too bad honestly. Can sing a lot better than other nu metal singers like that fag from Korn, Johnathan Davis. Lyrics aren't too bad either but can suck, like the ones that one guy posted. Those are some seriously lame lyrics ("Now take a real good look at/What you've fucking done to me").
Guitar #1: Sucks. Typical, boring nu metal riffs. But still better than those in Disturbed, etc. No solos either.
Guitar #2: See above.
Bass: So hard to hear and so hard to like.... Sucks.
Drums (regular set): The best member along with the singer. Not too bad really but there are better. He at least does fills and SOME double bass. DEFINITELY not the fastest double basser either (listen to Dying Fetus, Kataklysm or Deicide for some REAL fast double bass). I hate him the least.
Drums (tom kit): What exactly is the point of this when all he does is play the same notes on the toms as the regular drummer does? Fuck off!
Drums (trashcan): Can this guy not afford a real drum set? Can he not play one? Apparently not. This guy is equally as ponitless as the tom drummer. You can actually hear his drumming but he only plays like 4 notes per song. The rest of the time he just stands there like a dumbass.
Sampler: What the fuck does he do as well? You hear NOTHING from this asshole! Even if you could he would suck. Die!
DJ (Scratches): Don't make me laugh.
So if 2 out of 9 members are decent, how good could the band overall be?
Oh, but wait! The material! More or less up to one's opinion but generally revolves around, "I'm a victim. I'm very angry and/or hurt. I hate you. Feel sorry for me." Nothing complex in the arrangements and maybe some creativity.
Fans of Slipknots label themselves as "maggots", a very fitting term. These "maggots" usually think they're badass rebels by listening to this band which offends their rich, uptight parents and are amongst the typical mallcore scene. I would never label myself a "maggot" if I were a fan of any band but these guys seem to be proud of it.
Despite what many say, Slipknot is featured to a limited degree on mainstream metal, mostly material from their latest release, which is much safer than their older stuff.
Overall, not the worst band, especially in nu metal, but very overrated. You know it can't be THAT good when kids wearing baggy cargo pants with a million pockets, hooded sweat jackets covered in grease stains, studded wristbands and wallet chains listen to it. But easily better than the likes of Korn.
P.S. Maggots, please stop telling us that we suck or to go fuck ourselves because we don't listen to the same "badass" mallcore band that you listen to. Also, we do not dislike/hate Slipknot because they're mainstream. That has nothing to do with them. We dislike/hate them because they're not that good/just fucking suck!
maggot: Holy shit! Slipknot is the best band ever! They are so talented! I love the way they wear masks and jumpsuits and purge themselves and jump around like apes, on stage!
real metalhead: Ever heard of Children of Bodom?
maggot: Who?
real metalhead. Exactly. By the way, you DO know you're known as a "maggot" right? Pretty degrading isn't it?
maggot: (hangs head in shame)
real metalhead: Ever heard of Children of Bodom?
maggot: Who?
real metalhead. Exactly. By the way, you DO know you're known as a "maggot" right? Pretty degrading isn't it?
maggot: (hangs head in shame)
by Correct January 07, 2006
I'm not sure what's worse: Tookie himself and his horrific crimes which he's never apologized for or the fact that people think he's such a do-gooder, especially that dumbshit motherfucker that said Tookie is a great man. What the fuck? The guy founded a gang, dipshit!
Anyway, he greased 4 people, never apologized for it, wrote a few anti-gang children's BOOKLETS, got nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize twice but didn't win and.... Wait, that's it. Of course, he got a raw deal despite all those appeals. It was all a race thing of course. Yeah....
Anyway, he greased 4 people, never apologized for it, wrote a few anti-gang children's BOOKLETS, got nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize twice but didn't win and.... Wait, that's it. Of course, he got a raw deal despite all those appeals. It was all a race thing of course. Yeah....
dumbass: Tookie was a great man! He wrote a bunch of anti-gang books for children and reformed! He even got nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. It's not like anyone can get nominated! He was a great person who did a lot and made up for his crimes.
smart person: No, he wasn't, you asshole! He never apologized and hardly did shit! He wrote a few pissy booklets and made a few lectures but never once said he was sorry! Someone should "Tookie" you!
author's note: Hey, is that a term yet? To "Tookie" someone?
smart person: No, he wasn't, you asshole! He never apologized and hardly did shit! He wrote a few pissy booklets and made a few lectures but never once said he was sorry! Someone should "Tookie" you!
author's note: Hey, is that a term yet? To "Tookie" someone?
by Correct January 07, 2006
An incorrect spelling of the word "newb" or "noob" or "n00b" (the last one might be considered a somewhat gay way of spelling it but is technically correct).
People who use this spelling of the word are total idiots and are themselves a NEWB.
People who use this spelling of the word are total idiots and are themselves a NEWB.
"Lolz nub ezpk pub gg pwned!" (Sadly, people actually say this and think by saying this they're badass and cool when in fact they're just the opposite.)
by Correct May 19, 2005
The WORST of the WORST! The King of Gay! The Master of Faggots! This guy is by far worst and overrated of all the fucking loser musical artists out there!
This flamer puts out extremely shitty, tastless music, which of course can't sell on its own. So he then gets a mediocre six-pack and flaunts himself in homoerotic poses and in videos to get the girls wet and foolish enough to buy his records. On top of that he's got an arrogant attitude of, "I'm the shit! Worship me! I'm so cool!"
This first-class faggot has no talent, tastes, skills, intelligence or even looks.
Idolizing this douche is another way of saying that you have low self-esteem and no taste in music or even good looks in a man, or in his case, a boy.
This flamer puts out extremely shitty, tastless music, which of course can't sell on its own. So he then gets a mediocre six-pack and flaunts himself in homoerotic poses and in videos to get the girls wet and foolish enough to buy his records. On top of that he's got an arrogant attitude of, "I'm the shit! Worship me! I'm so cool!"
This first-class faggot has no talent, tastes, skills, intelligence or even looks.
Idolizing this douche is another way of saying that you have low self-esteem and no taste in music or even good looks in a man, or in his case, a boy.
"Oh, my GAWD! That Usher is so HOT!"
"You were molested as a child, weren't you?"
*brief silence, followed by hanging head* "Yes." *cries*
"You were molested as a child, weren't you?"
*brief silence, followed by hanging head* "Yes." *cries*
by Correct May 19, 2005
1. Another way of saying, "I am a faggot and a poser. Please shoot me."
2. A pathetic attempt of acting cool.
3. A way to embarrass yourself and realize later on how stupid you were and feel full of regret.
*This is more often than not followed by a gesture of lifting or pushing something off one's shoulders.*
2. A pathetic attempt of acting cool.
3. A way to embarrass yourself and realize later on how stupid you were and feel full of regret.
*This is more often than not followed by a gesture of lifting or pushing something off one's shoulders.*
by Correct May 19, 2005
The nick name for the self-released album released by the metal band Metallica in 1991.
Despite the claims of the millions of defenders of this album, it was the turning point of the band where they lost their thrash status and sold out by releasing more mainstream-friendly, simplified and softened songs. Fans claim it still has their "metal edge" but if anything this "edge" is BARELY there.
It has many of their famous songs on it and has sold the most copies of all their albums to date. Nevertheless, the quality on the album is actual piss-poor when compared to their lesser selling previous 4 albums, albums that were actually thrash.
In summary, Metallica may have still retained some "metal" status on this album but it was a sell-out effort, the reason being up to this point they were known as the Pioneers of Thrash but then got greedy and changed their sound to be more "experimental", or in actuality, to sell more records.
Despite the claims of the millions of defenders of this album, it was the turning point of the band where they lost their thrash status and sold out by releasing more mainstream-friendly, simplified and softened songs. Fans claim it still has their "metal edge" but if anything this "edge" is BARELY there.
It has many of their famous songs on it and has sold the most copies of all their albums to date. Nevertheless, the quality on the album is actual piss-poor when compared to their lesser selling previous 4 albums, albums that were actually thrash.
In summary, Metallica may have still retained some "metal" status on this album but it was a sell-out effort, the reason being up to this point they were known as the Pioneers of Thrash but then got greedy and changed their sound to be more "experimental", or in actuality, to sell more records.
Sell-out Metallica fan: Wow, this Black album is the greatest release from Metallica yet! Everything after this was crap though!
Thrash Metallica fan: No, you dumbass, it's shit compared to their earlier work. The only reason it seems good to you is because this sell-out work sounds better than their later sell-out work. Get any of their first 4 albums instead. Those were actually thrash.
Sell-out Metallica fan: What's 'thrash'?
Thrash Metallica fan: No, you dumbass, it's shit compared to their earlier work. The only reason it seems good to you is because this sell-out work sounds better than their later sell-out work. Get any of their first 4 albums instead. Those were actually thrash.
Sell-out Metallica fan: What's 'thrash'?
by Correct December 31, 2005
verb: To retch or vomit;throw-up,spew or hurl
noun: The leftovers or by-products of vomiting. Vomit. The regurgitated contents of the stomach.
noun: The leftovers or by-products of vomiting. Vomit. The regurgitated contents of the stomach.
by Correct July 18, 2003