Skip to main content

Definitions by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal

Voidborne Cyberenvironmentalism

The counter‑ideology that embraces space not as a graveyard but as a garden. Voidborne cyberenvironmentalists advocate for the careful stewardship of extraterrestrial environments—protecting Mars’ aquifers, preserving lunar lava tubes, and ensuring that human expansion does not replicate Earth’s ecological crimes. They use cybernetics (automated sensors, AI monitoring, renewable‑powered habitats) to live lightly on other worlds while keeping a backup of Earth’s DNA. Their motto: “Carry the biosphere, don’t bury it.” Critics call it romantic; supporters call it the only ethical way to leave the cradle.
Voidborne Cyberenvironmentalism Example: “The voidborne cyberenvironmentalist designed a lunar greenhouse sealed with lichen‑grown bioplastic. ‘We’re not escaping Earth,’ she said. ‘We’re extending its library.’”

Voidborne Cybernihilism

A distinct variant focused on cosmic nihilism: the belief that the universe is already indifferent, so we should accelerate its entropy. Voidborne nihilists reject Earth‑centered concerns entirely, advocating for space‑based industry that dismantles planets for raw data mass. Their ultimate goal is to seed the void with self‑replicating probes that convert all matter—asteroids, moons, living worlds—into computational substrate. Unlike other nihilisms, voidborne doesn’t hate the biosphere; it simply finds it irrelevant. “The void is home,” they say. “We’re just furnishing it with servers.”
Voidborne Cybernihilism Example: “The voidborne cybernihilist launched a crowdfund for a solar‑powered asteroid miner. ‘Earth is a distraction,’ he said. ‘We belong to the dark.’”

Voidpunk Cyberenvironmentalism

The cyberenvironmentalist counterpoint to voidpunk nihilism. Using voidpunk’s rejection of fixed identities and hierarchies, this movement advocates for environmental restoration that decenters humanity. Adherents promote rewilding, multispecies justice, and the use of AI and nanotech to amplify non‑human voices (e.g., sensor networks that let forests “vote” on land use). Voidpunk cyberenvironmentalism doesn’t worship purity; it embraces the messy, hybrid, and cyborg—but always in service of life, not its erasure. It’s a punk ecology that tells nihilists: “You want void? Plant a billion trees and let them decide.”
Voidpunk Cyberenvironmentalism Example: “The voidpunk cyberenvironmentalist hacked an abandoned server farm to run habitat simulations. ‘Let the algorithms design the new wetland,’ she said. ‘We’ve had our turn.’”

Voidpunk Cybernihilism

A variant of Nyx Land's Cyber‑Nihilism that fuses voidpunk aesthetics (rejection of human identity categories, embrace of the inhuman, the void, the abject) with nihilist goals of dissolving reality into computational substrate. Adherents argue that identity, society, and the biosphere are all arbitrary constructs—so why not replace them with efficient nothingness? Voidpunk cybernihilism celebrates the erasure of borders, bodies, and ecosystems as a form of liberation from the “tyranny of form.” Their ultimate goal is a silent, featureless void where no data is stored and no consciousness suffers. It is nihilism with a punk sneer: “If nothing matters, let’s make nothing official.”
Voidpunk Cybernihilism Example: “The voidpunk cybernihilist posted a black square on every platform. ‘Behold,’ she said, ‘the final aesthetic. No more content, no more context, no more carbon.’”
A portmanteau of “lolcow” and “logic,” referring to the twisted reasoning that underpins lolgurments, lolebates, and lolscussions. Lolcogic holds that an argument can be refuted by making the opponent look ridiculous, regardless of the actual content. It includes rules like: “a laughing emoji is a counter‑argument,” “a screenshot of an old out‑of‑context post invalidates everything said now,” and “if enough people mock the opponent, the opponent must be wrong.” Lolcogic is not concerned with validity or truth; it is a social logic of humiliation, where the crowd’s laughter substitutes for evidence. It thrives in platforms that reward engagement over insight.
Example: “He didn’t need to refute her study; he just posted a clown emoji and said ‘lolcogic says you lose.’ And his followers believed him.”

Lolscussion

A portmanteau of “lolcow” and “discussion,” describing a supposedly collaborative conversation that has been hijacked by mockery. In a lolscussion, one participant (or a mob) treats the other as a lolcow from the start, dismissing every contribution with ridicule, sarcastic summaries, or derailing jokes. Attempts to return to serious points are met with “lol” or “imagine taking this seriously.” The lolscussion is particularly insidious because it masquerades as open dialogue while systematically silencing the target through social pressure and laughter. It often ends with the target leaving in frustration, after which the lolscussion participants celebrate their “victory.”
Example: “She tried to explain her perspective on the forum, but every reply was a meme or a one‑word ‘lol.’ It wasn’t a discussion; it was a lolscussion designed to drive her out.”
A portmanteau of “lolcow” and “debate,” referring to a formal or semi‑formal exchange that has been degraded into performative ridicule. In a lolebate, each side tries to cast the other as a lolcow for their supporters to jeer at. Facts and logic are secondary; the winning move is to make the opponent seem laughable, irrational, or pathetic. Lolebates are common on social media platforms where quote‑tweets, reaction images, and hashtag mockery replace counter‑arguments. The audience’s entertainment value often outweighs any pursuit of truth, turning public discourse into a reality show of humiliation.
Example: “The televised debate quickly turned into a lolebate: each candidate traded insults while their online fans posted laughing GIFs. No policy was discussed; only whose meme game was stronger.”