A speech to express gratitude to the user-publishers at Urbandictionary for inducting definitions into the database. Akin to the speeches made by accomplished athletes who have excelled at their sport. These are definitions which have been accepted after many arduous attempts but well worth it too. Also similar to Academy Award Speech or Grammy Speech.
I won't make my UD Induction Speech long, I only have 30 seconds. But I would like to thank God, my parents, my children, my cats, my pets, my teachers, my workmates for all their support. But special thanks to all great user publishers who make this place great and inducting my Sadie
by lando888 August 12, 2015
by Grodd June 30, 2015
A word that has lost its innocent image due to the constant abuse of the term by online radicals and liberals to silence everyone who is critical to a certain issue.
P1: Shut the fuck up, no one wants to reply on your spam threads retard.
P2: But I have the First Amendment! Anyway this is an imageboard, so fuck off! You don't belong here!
P1: You use free speech to make excuses for your spam? Come on, man.
P2: But I have the First Amendment! Anyway this is an imageboard, so fuck off! You don't belong here!
P1: You use free speech to make excuses for your spam? Come on, man.
by #LGCC9CCPP August 10, 2021
Anybody can say or do something when there is no fear of getting in trouble, it's who is still willing to do something they could or will get in trouble for.
by The Original Agahnim June 24, 2021
Steven likes the diagrams so... here’s a diagram:
Overarching framework where free
speech is a real thing
V
__________________________________
| The people who’s opinions are |
| allowed within the confines of |
| the overarching framework |
| where free speech is a thing |
|_________________________________|
This ☝️ is Jordan Peterson’s conceptualization of free speech.... There’s a lot to unpack here..... So... Let’s get to it!
How the “Postmodernists
conceptualize the box
(According to Dr. JeepJorp)
V
___________________________
| Group 1 Group 2 |
| Group 3 Group 4 |
| Et Cetra |
| __________________________|
I am here 👉😈👈 I’m what you
call an outside-the-box thinker
Overarching framework where free
speech is a real thing
V
__________________________________
| The people who’s opinions are |
| allowed within the confines of |
| the overarching framework |
| where free speech is a thing |
|_________________________________|
This ☝️ is Jordan Peterson’s conceptualization of free speech.... There’s a lot to unpack here..... So... Let’s get to it!
How the “Postmodernists
conceptualize the box
(According to Dr. JeepJorp)
V
___________________________
| Group 1 Group 2 |
| Group 3 Group 4 |
| Et Cetra |
| __________________________|
I am here 👉😈👈 I’m what you
call an outside-the-box thinker
Free Speech part 1
Hym “Now, the postmodernists don’t believe in autonomous individuals with thoughts and opinions. They believe that there are only groups vying for power. Jordan JeepJorpson believes that the individual is not ‘atomized’ and that ‘most people’ do not think (because they need to go through the institutions that cast him aside to be taught how to think ✋😒 but not how the institutions are currently teaching people to think because it’s too postmodernists and Marxist but instead how he thinks). INSTEAD, the individual is nested within a ‘Hierarchy of values.’ It looks like this:
____________________________
\Political/Religious engagement/
\Ascension economic of hierarchy /
\ Broader community /
\ Family unit /
\ Individual /
\————————————/
Hmmm... 🤔 Well now we need a name for this structure ... Hmmm... Let’s call this a.... Hmm... A grope? No... Graaawooooop... Grawoop? Grawoop! We’ll call it a grawoop! Now, if there is any dysfunction at any level of the grawoop, it is impossible for an individual to be sane. Therefore, you have a responsibility to become a part of one of these grawoops. Regardless of whether or not you believe in the ideas the grawoops espouse (because, who cares what you believe? Ammaright?) “
Hym “Now, the postmodernists don’t believe in autonomous individuals with thoughts and opinions. They believe that there are only groups vying for power. Jordan JeepJorpson believes that the individual is not ‘atomized’ and that ‘most people’ do not think (because they need to go through the institutions that cast him aside to be taught how to think ✋😒 but not how the institutions are currently teaching people to think because it’s too postmodernists and Marxist but instead how he thinks). INSTEAD, the individual is nested within a ‘Hierarchy of values.’ It looks like this:
____________________________
\Political/Religious engagement/
\Ascension economic of hierarchy /
\ Broader community /
\ Family unit /
\ Individual /
\————————————/
Hmmm... 🤔 Well now we need a name for this structure ... Hmmm... Let’s call this a.... Hmm... A grope? No... Graaawooooop... Grawoop? Grawoop! We’ll call it a grawoop! Now, if there is any dysfunction at any level of the grawoop, it is impossible for an individual to be sane. Therefore, you have a responsibility to become a part of one of these grawoops. Regardless of whether or not you believe in the ideas the grawoops espouse (because, who cares what you believe? Ammaright?) “
by Hym Iam November 17, 2022
by Vivansh June 10, 2022
Speech-to-Texas is a state in which you are talking with far too much "twang" and as a result , speech-to-text went full Texas on ya.
For example, if you say well that truck still tows more than the other truck, and speech-to-text types "Main that truck steel toes more!", You've just witnessed "Speech-to-Texas".
For example, if you say well that truck still tows more than the other truck, and speech-to-text types "Main that truck steel toes more!", You've just witnessed "Speech-to-Texas".
Yo man , you need to work on that twang , your speech to text is actin' up and went full bore "Speech-to-Texas".
by TexasTea123 October 11, 2022