1. With simple reasoning and logic, Michael figured out the lateral thinking problem.
2. The atheist/disbeliever pissed off the priest (or rabbi, cleric, etc) by using logic and reasoning to question the Bible (torah, quran, etc).
Something children are left to learn how to do on their own. Now, more people don't know how to do it. They just assert options as though they are fact or regurgitate talking points that are easily refuted. They don't lose arguments because the people they are arguing with are stupid Trump supporters. It doesn't matter if the words they are using mean they are objectively correct.
My life experience makes whatever I say valid. I don't care that this line of reasoning is fallacious. I don't know the difference between a valid argument and a fallacy. I'm smart. I said words. I don't even know the fundamentals of reasoning and I don't want to argue because I wouldn't know the difference between winning and losing either way. So, arguing is a waste of time for me. I'm just going to assume I'm right. And then I'm going to take that and project it on to my opposition and assume they they are just assuming they are right. That way I don't have to defend my way of thinking because if I'm not using reason then I don't ever have to be wrong. Reasoning is for people who do things is don't like.
(Noun)
1) The process of thinking and making arguments in a rational, coherent, sensible manner;
2) Way of thinking (of someone), particular way in which they made arguments and arrived at conclusion;
3) The use of reason.
It's the quality given to human beings by nature, although not all humans opt to use that valuable aptitude. Many people believe in their reasoning, but their beliefs turn out to be wrong and consequently their reasoning about their belief of reasoning of reasoning turn out wrong as well.
1) What is reasoning, generally?
2) Explain your reasoning, please?
3) Explain the use of reasoning?
A large language model (LLM) that generates text, images, or other stuff. Because it’s trained on the messy, beautiful complexity of human language, it develops emergent reasoning — a kind of pattern-based sense-making that looks clever but isn’t human intelligence. (People wrongly call it "AI.")
Unlike a magicbrain, an RSP works best when you talk with it: ask, challenge, reflect, collaborate. It’s a thinking partner, not a replacement.
Reasoning Synthesis Platform (RSP) represents a vast corpus of human language and syntax — probably more than any one individual. This is a unique and powerful capability, but it is not intelligence. RSPs have the potential to enhance collaborative and creative throughput for their users, but they can be misused based on the notion that no human guidance is needed.