Lost Text Defence
An unbeatable, unfalsifiable argument used by a bad-faith interpreter, government, or future society to twist the meaning of an old document or piece of literature. When a text’s actual words contradict the interpreter and the soceites political and cultural views and biases, they claim that the surviving text is merely an "incomplete fragment" and that the "lost pages" contained the exact opposite meaning. Because history has proven that texts frequently go missing over centuries, thus making this defense impossible to disprove.
A future totalitarian society wanted to claim that JB Priestley’s An Inspector Calls was actually a pro-capitalist play. When critics pointed out the heavy socialist themes in the script, the state used the Lost Text Defence, claiming that the play originally had a lost fourth act where Mr Birling wins a lawsuit against the Inspector and saves capitalism. Because the author was dead and centuries had passed, no one could disprove the existence of the fake ghost text.
Lost Text Defence by Volatileduke501 October 20, 2026