Fallacy of Hyperrationalization

The practice of applying rational argumentation to literally everything—including topics that are fundamentally beyond the reach of reason, or that should be beyond the pale of acceptable debate. Hyperrationalization treats all questions as equally debatable, all positions as equally worthy of engagement, all claims as requiring the same rational scrutiny. It's the fallacy that leads people to "debate" whether genocide is wrong, whether slavery should be reinstated, whether racism has merits—as if these were open questions rather than settled horrors. Hyperrationalization mistakes the form of reason for its substance, treating the act of arguing as inherently virtuous regardless of what's being argued. It's reason as performance, rationality as spectacle.

Example: "The panel was titled 'Debating the Merits of Slavery: A Rational Approach.' The Fallacy of Hyperrationalization had turned atrocity into abstraction, evil into exercise. There was nothing to debate; there was only horror. But hyperrationalization demanded that all questions be open, all positions be considered, all arguments be heard—even those that should never be spoken."

Fallacy of Hyperrationalization by Abzugal February 21, 2026