Skip to main content

public vs private

niche tiktok that'll make everyone fall in love with you. (side effect: you will fall off)
'my public favourite colour is black, and my private is brown ts is my public vs private'
by iamtrue February 7, 2026
mugGet the public vs private mug.
A logical fallacy where someone dismisses an entire ideology, system, or idea by pointing to its worst outcomes, stripped of all context, history, and mitigating factors. The name comes from the classic "Communism killed millions" argument—which isn't false on its face, but becomes fallacious when used to end all discussion without examining specific contexts, variations, alternatives, or comparative harms. The Fallacy of Absolute Privation isolates the worst instances, treats them as the whole truth, and uses suffering as a conversation-stopper. It's not that the suffering isn't real—it's that citing it without context, comparison, or analysis is a rhetorical weapon, not an argument. Any system, ideology, or idea can be condemned by its worst expressions; the fallacy is pretending that's the end of the story.
Fallacy of Absolute Privation (Fallacy of Communism Killed Millions) "We were discussing educational reforms, and someone mentioned learning from Nordic models. Response: 'Nordic socialism? You mean like Communism that killed millions?' That's the Fallacy of Absolute Privation—conflating Nordic social democracy with Soviet communism, ignoring all context, and using historical tragedy to shut down discussion of school lunch programs."
by Dumu The Void February 24, 2026
mugGet the Fallacy of Absolute Privation (Fallacy of Communism Killed Millions) mug.
A fallacy where someone takes a single isolated instance of harm, suffering, or failure and uses it to condemn an entire system, practice, or idea. Unlike Absolute Privation (which focuses on the worst historical examples), Isolated Privation grabs one anecdote—one medical error, one plane crash, one bad teacher—and treats it as representative of the whole. "One patient died from this treatment, therefore the treatment is worthless." "One plane crashed, therefore air travel is unsafe." "One priest abused a child, therefore the entire institution is evil." The isolated case may be real, but using it to condemn the whole ignores base rates, statistical reasoning, and the difference between exceptions and rules.
"My aunt tried acupuncture once and didn't feel better. Now she says 'Acupuncture is complete fraud' every time it's mentioned. That's Fallacy of Isolated Privation—one anecdote, zero context, infinite certainty. The plural of anecdote is not data, Karen."
by Dumu The Void February 24, 2026
mugGet the Fallacy of Isolated Privation mug.
A fallacy where someone identifies a specific harm, flaw, or failure within a system and uses that specific critique to dismiss the entire system without addressing its other aspects, benefits, or complexities. The critique may be valid—the specific privation is real—but the fallacy lies in treating it as dispositive, as if acknowledging one problem means nothing else matters. "This hospital has long waiting times, therefore healthcare is completely broken." "This politician made a mistake, therefore everything they've done is worthless." "This theory has one unexplained phenomenon, therefore the whole theory is garbage." Specific Privation mistakes a part for the whole, a flaw for a failure, a critique for a conclusion.
"I pointed out one limitation in a philosophical framework I generally admire. Response: 'Aha! So you admit it's completely wrong!' That's Fallacy of Specific Privation—a valid critique of one aspect becomes, in their hands, proof that the whole thing is worthless. Criticism isn't condemnation, but try telling them that."
by Dumu The Void February 24, 2026
mugGet the Fallacy of Specific Privation mug.

Fallacy of General Privation

A fallacy where someone makes a vague, general accusation of harm or failure—"this system causes suffering," "this idea has negative consequences," "these people have done bad things"—without specifying what harm, to whom, under what conditions, or compared to what alternatives. The accusation is broad enough to be unfalsifiable and vague enough to avoid evidence. General Privation trades on the emotional power of "harm" without the intellectual work of demonstrating it. It's the rhetorical equivalent of "something bad happened somewhere, therefore your point is invalid." The privation is asserted, not demonstrated; generalized, not specified; weaponized, not analyzed.
"Every time I try to discuss economic policy, someone says 'Capitalism causes suffering.' That's the Fallacy of General Privation—vague enough to be unanswerable, broad enough to shut down discussion, and completely useless for actual policy analysis. What suffering? Where? Compared to what? The generality is the point—it's a conversation-ender, not a contribution."
by Dumu The Void February 24, 2026
mugGet the Fallacy of General Privation mug.

Fallacy of Special Privation

A fallacy where someone applies standards of privation—demands to account for harm, suffering, or failure—selectively, demanding that one system or idea be judged by its worst outcomes while exempting another system from the same standard. "Religion has caused wars, therefore religion is evil" from someone who ignores wars fought for secular ideologies. "Science has been wrong before, therefore science isn't trustworthy" from someone who trusts science when it confirms their biases. "Your side has bad people" from someone whose side also has bad people, but that doesn't count. Special Privation is hypocrisy in logical form: the harms that matter are the harms your opponents cause; your side's harms are justified, minimal, or irrelevant.
"He spent an hour listing every harm caused by organized religion throughout history. When I mentioned secular atrocities, he said 'That's different—those weren't really about ideology.' That's Fallacy of Special Privation: one standard for them, another for us. The privation is special because it only applies to people we don't like."
by Dumu The Void February 24, 2026
mugGet the Fallacy of Special Privation mug.
We all know that Sydney's beautiful summer beaches are on the radar of most people, but have you ever considered taking a private winter tour by hiring a private Sydney tour around the Blue Mountains?

Just an hour west of Sydney, in our warmer months, The Blue Mountains are a real figure – and it is June, July and August that recall Australia's winter.

In winter, tourists guides like private Sydney tours receive you with a rare pocket of fog in Katoomba, low-lying cloud pillows across Jamison Valley and haunting dark sky over Echo Point, followed by a perfect double-arch over the horizon, not just a single rainbow. This natural beauty renders an unbelievable photographer.

This additional natural beauty offers you the amazing imagery of the canyons and forests described under the UNESCO world heritage.
The Winter of Australia is Sydney's rainy season so it is a must-go for a few quick walks along the river. Torrents of water dropping hundreds of metres below and tiny waterfalls not accessible in the summer welcome. You will be invited by private Sydney tours. You will find Wentworth Falls, Weeping Rock, Gordon Falls, Govetts Jump, Leura Cascades, Katoomba Falls, and Bridal Falls are among the better-seen waterfalls during heavy rainfall, and some of these other waterfalls are not visible.

Global Australian flora - the gold wattle reveals that during the cooler months it’s still pretty worn. Their cylindrical or spherical bright yellow flowers add an overflowing rear fall.
Avoid Crowd and Experience Blue Mountains with Private Sidney Tours
by Private Sydney tours March 31, 2021
mugGet the Avoid Crowd and Experience Blue Mountains with Private Sidney Tours mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email