When a girl or guy is sexually attracted to both sex's and has no preference. Their not specific with which gender they like and prefer. Similar to being a switch hitter, they like both genders and gender really isn't a cause for debate.
As long as their hot and we have a connection it doesn't matter what their gender is, I'd tap that.
Guy1: are you gay or straight, I've seen you with both?
Guy2: I'm non-gender specific.
Guy1: wtf does that mean?
Guy2: it doesn't matter what gender you are just as long as the feelings are mutual.
Guy1: are you gay or straight, I've seen you with both?
Guy2: I'm non-gender specific.
Guy1: wtf does that mean?
Guy2: it doesn't matter what gender you are just as long as the feelings are mutual.
by Tauboy2 September 7, 2013
Get the Non-gender specificmug. sounds made by government officials when interviewing a member of the public, intended to convey empathy but promising nothing.
As she listened to the refugee's heart-wrenching story, the immigration officer made non-specific encouraging noises.
by wellwell January 29, 2009
Get the non-specific encouraging noisesmug. (idiomatic, Southern US) To engage in/attempt to engage in sexual activity by means of doxxing the already married man who caused your gay awakening.
Term originally created in 1945 by Albert Einstein.
Term originally created in 1945 by Albert Einstein.
“I told you!” Gabriel said, “I was at the park with my friends, specifically montecito!”
“You whore! You promised me last time you would stop! I’m breaking up with you!”
“You whore! You promised me last time you would stop! I’m breaking up with you!”
by albyeinstein April 10, 2022
Get the I was at the park with my friends, specifically montecitomug. Two people who usually start off as acquaintances and find common ground in the most fundamental spheres so much so that all the differences between them that they discover in the course of knowing each other, stop mattering and only start drawing them further towards each other in the most amusing yet deeply rooted manner.
They then transition from becoming friends to something that put the words 'friend' and even 'best friend' to shame and effortlessly at that. Neither time, distance nor arguments of all sorts- that of a silly nature to something pretty serious, nothing can shake it off and the process of figuring out those arguments only go on to strengthen the bond that already existed.
This specific friendship includes emotions that cannot be explained, but only be felt in outbursts so strong that it hurts parts of the body that were thought to not exist. It includes a passion for togetherness which cannot be measured in any form except some sentimental and explicit emojis.
This specific friendship can survive the most grueling of circumstances and make you feel at complete 'shanti' as it gets, thus its nothing less than one in a 'mil'.
It also leads to several fights, sleepless nights but ultimately exclusive rights.
This kind of friendship is a constant.
It cannot be generalized or replicated, hence it is very specific.
They then transition from becoming friends to something that put the words 'friend' and even 'best friend' to shame and effortlessly at that. Neither time, distance nor arguments of all sorts- that of a silly nature to something pretty serious, nothing can shake it off and the process of figuring out those arguments only go on to strengthen the bond that already existed.
This specific friendship includes emotions that cannot be explained, but only be felt in outbursts so strong that it hurts parts of the body that were thought to not exist. It includes a passion for togetherness which cannot be measured in any form except some sentimental and explicit emojis.
This specific friendship can survive the most grueling of circumstances and make you feel at complete 'shanti' as it gets, thus its nothing less than one in a 'mil'.
It also leads to several fights, sleepless nights but ultimately exclusive rights.
This kind of friendship is a constant.
It cannot be generalized or replicated, hence it is very specific.
by Driving Instructor101 March 31, 2021
Get the Specific Friendmug. Summary: AI will specifically destroy jobs created by computers in the first place, preserving 'offline' jobs, while minimally impacting work quality, and preserving gross productivity.
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
"I'm a USPS door delivery mailman, so, according to West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destruction, my job delivering mail should be fine even if the Postal Service grows more efficient at correctly routing addresses and scheduling delivery drivers."
by Zack West February 18, 2024
Get the West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destructionmug. 
"I'm not sure of the specific utility of the word, 'meme.' Why not just call it idea? I suppose coining a brand new word glamorizes a concept and helps us appreciate it on a contextual metaplane."
by shadyladyk March 10, 2010
Get the Specific utilitymug.