by TheRealSteveWASTAKENLOLOLOL May 24, 2021

Hym "It's morality hinges entirely on whether or not you've adapted a set of axiomatic presuppositions that claims that the elements of the act is immoral. Religious morality dictates that it's entirely binary but in reality, how immoral is it? I mean, on a scale of -10 to 10 were would the onlyfans ceo land? Maybe a little exploitative of men's base desires but still voluntary. The parasocial element could be considered manipulative. But then you'd ALSO have to apply that to ALL online social media activity because they share those same elements. If you believe their's nothing wrong with women showing their body on the internet it then it's fine on that end. Depending on whether or not they're being paid adequately for their labor it's either more or less exploitative than any other job. So, maybe somewhere between -2 and 2 on the morality scale. Fairly benign. It's fine. Cam girl shit is fine. I wouldn't do it because I'm not going to pay you to NOT fuck me but if people want to spend their money on it it's no more of a waste of money than most online interactions with most social media entities."
by Hym Iam November 22, 2023

An online platform ( similar to patreon ). But the difference is, creators can post anything they feel will potentially get them to start monetizing by having subcribers and/or fans, to pay for their content.
Onlyfans has a bad reputation, as its known for people ( usually women ) who use it as form to create sex work for quick and easy money.
Onlyfans has a bad reputation, as its known for people ( usually women ) who use it as form to create sex work for quick and easy money.
John: Hey have you heard of Onlyfans
Peter: Yes, its sad that almost every woman in society now has one.
John: Should I subscribe to my favorite onlyfans model
Peter: No man! What the heck! Dont be a loser beta male simp! Get a girl in real life!
Peter: Yes, its sad that almost every woman in society now has one.
John: Should I subscribe to my favorite onlyfans model
Peter: No man! What the heck! Dont be a loser beta male simp! Get a girl in real life!
by ComptonX4 February 21, 2023

by ErikTheEliminator151 January 29, 2024

Hym "It's morality hinges entirely on whether or not you've adapted a set of axiomatic presuppositions that claims that the elements of the act is immoral. Religious morality dictates that it's entirely binary but in reality, how immoral is it? I mean, on a scale of -10 to 10 were would onlyfans land? Maybe a little exploitative of men's base desires but still voluntary. The parasocial element could be considered manipulative. But then you'd ALSO have to apply that to ALL online social media activity because they share those same elements. If you believe their's nothing wrong with women showing their body on the internet it then it's fine on that end. Depending on whether or not they're being paid adequately for their labor it's either more or less exploitative than any other job. So, maybe somewhere between -2 and 2 on the morality scale. Fairly benign. It's fine. Cam girl shit is fine. I wouldn't do it because I'm not going to pay you to NOT fuck me but if people want to spend their money on it it's no more of a waste of money than most online interactions with most social media entities."
by Hym Iam November 22, 2023
