me-jerk reaction

Reacting according to a certain habitual manner; unthinking:

a knee-jerk conservative.

When you talk about issues today, all you seem to hear is a me-jerk reaction.

by Chefspam May 31, 2018

"firehose" remark-reaction

Refers to the involuntary "geyser" of liquid/slurry that one produces when something funny/shocking is spoken in his presence while he's eating/drinking something, said utterance causes an "automatic" or "uncontrollable-on-short-notice" lung- expulsion from a laugh or cough, which in turn causes a forceful ejection of the mouth's contents which shoots out for several feet and disgustingly messes up anything (or anyONE) in its path.

A classic example of a "firehose" remark-reaction is when Jimmy Culp does an astonished "sploooot!" when he hears his name mentioned by Robert Stack on the Tonight Show immediately after taking a deep swig of beer.

by QuacksO February 21, 2019

Live Starved Reaction

a user on public chatting service "Discord" who is assumed to be homosexual and has a liking to male human beings.

Live Starved Reaction is soooo gay lmaooooooooooo

by awasasawsfaw December 4, 2022

Giving allergic reaction

Not slaying, being unwanted, deserves all the L’s, etc.

“You’re giving allergic reaction”🤢

by anonymous September 18, 2022

The exact opposite reaction

You know the funny thing about the A.I. learning?

Iam "Me and Joe had the exact opposite reaction"

*Sees A.I. learning*
*In unison*
Joe "They are going to kill us..."
Hym "We are going to have to kill all of them..."

by Hym Iam May 17, 2023

Post hoc rationalization

Don't care bitch you don't hage a right to do it EITHER WAY you fucking mongrel. You need to take your own advice and humble yourselves OR get your kids murdered more frequently until you learn to stop infesting people's lives like the cockroaches you are.

Hym "You're trying this as post hoc rationalization and it isn't going to work. 1 or 0 fuck-face. Choose."

by Hym Iam June 6, 2024

Hard Problem of Rationality

The paradox that the tool we use to evaluate truth—rationality—cannot be justified using purely rational means without circular reasoning. Why should we be rational? Because it's effective? That's a pragmatic, not rational, argument. Rationality rests on axioms (like "the world is consistent") that must be assumed, not proven. The hard problem is that rationality is the judge, jury, and executioner of thought, but it can't put itself on trial without presupposing its own validity.

Example: "He tried to use pure rationality to convince his friend to be rational. 'You should value logic because... it's logical?' He hit the hard problem of rationality: the foundation of reason isn't a brick; it's a turtle floating in mid-air, and asking 'why?' just makes it fall."

by Abzugal January 30, 2026