Skip to main content

approach-avoidance defensive conflict

Being a backronym of AADC (the title of an Indonesian movie), "approach-avoidance defensive conflict" refers to the psychological struggle where a single goal has both positive and negative aspects, causing a person to be both drawn to and repelled by it. This internal tension leads to stress and indecision as the individual weighs the pros and cons, and the conflict often results in periods of back-and-forth thinking. Examples include wanting a promotion but dreading the longer hours, or wanting a vacation but being discouraged by the high cost.
She faced an approach-avoidance defensive conflict when she considered accepting the job offer; the salary was great, but the thought of a longer commute made her hesitate.
approach-avoidance defensive conflict mug front
Get the approach-avoidance defensive conflict mug.
See more merch

longer than the Confederacy

lame ass way to say longer than four years as if that’s an achievement
My chair’s lived longer than the Confederacy!

You have pronoun confusion

You though I was talking about YOU (Singlular/Localized/That Specific One) and are conflating the broad conceptual YOU (People in the abstract) or what I am saying applied to YOU in which case it would be (Peripheral/Incidental) YOU or I was speaking propositionally in which case what I'm saying relates to the person issuing the proposition but isn't necessarily directed at the person theme. Additionally, I am the I to whom I am referring when I write and, therefore, the intersubjective you would not apply to me.
Hym Iam "You have pronoun confusion. I probably did that wrong. That's why we need Genjustsu no Doki. That should fix that immediately."

Self-Serving Confirmation Bias

The emotionally motivated tendency to seek and interpret evidence in ways that protect or enhance one's self-image. When success occurs, we confirm it was due to our skill; when failure occurs, we confirm it was due to external factors. We remember our contributions vividly and others' forgetfully. We judge our own ethically ambiguous actions by our intentions, and others' identical actions by their outcomes. This bias isn't about accuracy; it's about maintaining a coherent, positive narrative of the self.
Self-Serving Confirmation Bias Example: You ace a test and attribute it to intelligence. You fail a test and blame the unfair questions or lack of sleep. Your coworker, observing your performance, sees the opposite pattern in you. Both of you are exhibiting Self-Serving Confirmation Bias. The ego is not a neutral observer of your life; it is a lawyer, and its client—the self—is always innocent, always capable, always the hero of its own story.

Law of Scientific Conformations

The principle that science, like proteins, can take on many different forms—folding and refolding into diverse structures depending on context, while maintaining its essential nature. Just as a single protein can have multiple conformations that determine its function, science conforms to different shapes across disciplines, cultures, and historical periods. Physics and sociology are both science, but they're folded differently—different methods, different standards, different forms of evidence. The Law of Scientific Conformations recognizes that this diversity is not weakness but strength: science's ability to conform to different domains is what makes it universally applicable. It doesn't look the same everywhere because it can't; it adapts to what it studies.
Example: "He couldn't understand why psychology didn't look like physics—where were the elegant equations, the precise predictions? The Law of Scientific Conformations explained: psychology is science folded differently, adapted to the complexity of its subject. It's not less science; it's science in a different conformation. Both are valid; both are necessary; both are science."

Law of Logical Conformations

The principle that logic, like proteins, can take on many different forms—folding and refolding into diverse structures while maintaining its essential nature as valid reasoning. Classical logic, intuitionistic logic, paraconsistent logic, fuzzy logic—these are different conformations of logic, each suited to different domains, each valid in its context. The Law of Logical Conformations recognizes that logic is not one rigid structure but a family of structures, all related, all serving the function of valid inference. Logic doesn't look the same everywhere because it can't; it adapts to what it's reasoning about.
Example: "He insisted that only classical logic was 'real' logic; everything else was deviation. The Law of Logical Conformations suggested otherwise: different logics are different conformations, each valid for its purpose. Quantum logic works for quantum phenomena; fuzzy logic works for vagueness. They're not less logic; they're logic folded differently. He remained unconvinced, which was logical in his conformation."

Do you hate the band Dashboard Confessional 

Cause it is almost like my other definition wasn’t approved
Do you hate the band Dashboard Confessional

(You know that I am talking to you)