by Tony Simmons January 8, 2009
Get the scamera mug.The measure of how intense your poop is after eating Mexican food. Based on the Fujita Scale (F-Scale) used to measure a tornado's intensity.
F0: Unaffected
F1: Little worse than usual
F2: Burns a little, not too bad
F3: Intense burning, but only one round
F4: Intense burning with multiple battles with the toilet
F5: Insane burning, seems like it will never end, nowhere near solid, soaks through the toilet paper, has you screaming and wishing the toilet had handlebars and cool air jets
F0: Unaffected
F1: Little worse than usual
F2: Burns a little, not too bad
F3: Intense burning, but only one round
F4: Intense burning with multiple battles with the toilet
F5: Insane burning, seems like it will never end, nowhere near solid, soaks through the toilet paper, has you screaming and wishing the toilet had handlebars and cool air jets
I won't be able to make the party to tonight because we got Mexican food for lunch, I'm at an F5 on the fajita scale and won't be leaving home any time soon.
by ajm26 October 4, 2013
Get the fajita scale mug.Related Words
scapegoat
• Scape
• Scaper
• Scape Goating
• Scape666
• scapecat
• scaped
• scapedick
• Scapegay
• Scape-Driver
With the advent of RapeaXe, there may come a time in a man's life when he does not desire having his penis impaled by angry barbs. Instead, he may prefer to send his go-to man, or scapecock, if you will, to spring the chauvinist trap.
The scapecock does not need to be smart; he merely needs be the least liked friend in a group of people, willing to fulfill any task the alpha males bequeath.
The scapecock does not need to be smart; he merely needs be the least liked friend in a group of people, willing to fulfill any task the alpha males bequeath.
Scenario 1 (At a party):
Alpha Male - "Yo! Cheeze-whiz, you take point. Let me know when you're done romancing her seven kingdoms."
Scapecock - "Aw thanks man! I won't let you down!"
Scenario 2 (On the way to the colloquial rapee):
Alpha Male - "Oh hey way to go buddy! I think you deserve firsties on this one!"
Scapecock - "Sick! Thanks man!"
Alpha Male - "Yo! Cheeze-whiz, you take point. Let me know when you're done romancing her seven kingdoms."
Scapecock - "Aw thanks man! I won't let you down!"
Scenario 2 (On the way to the colloquial rapee):
Alpha Male - "Oh hey way to go buddy! I think you deserve firsties on this one!"
Scapecock - "Sick! Thanks man!"
by Aquilae May 1, 2010
Get the Scapecock mug.A scale for rating girls' attractiveness that is less subjective than the traditional 1-10 scale. Referred to as the diamond scale because there are very few on the extremes and the vast majority in the center. Scale runs 1-5, from best to worst.
1= Unrealistically hot. Top .0001% of girls. Pretty much restricted to top-tier celebrities, not a term you can just throw around. You see only a handful of these in your lifetime.
2= Extemely attractive. No significant flaws, and close to universally desired. Top 1-2% of girls.
3- = Basically the girl in a group that is clearly more attractive than the others. Anyone definitely referred to as "hot", someone that people would go out of their way to get with. About 15-20% of girls.
3 = 60-70% of girls. All decent, but nothing out of the ordinary. Realistically, they're not really significantly better or worse than each other.
3+ = Not your first choice, but you'd go for it if inebriated or desperate. Most butterfaces fall into this category, except for a few that might climb into the 3 range. About as common as 3-'s.
4= Distinctly unattractive. Someone you would get made fun of at length and universally for getting with. Roughly as common as 2's.
5= Horrendous. You see these only very rarely, about as much as 1's. These go beyond the realm of "typical ugly", and usually require deformities or other highly unusual issues with their appearance.
1= Unrealistically hot. Top .0001% of girls. Pretty much restricted to top-tier celebrities, not a term you can just throw around. You see only a handful of these in your lifetime.
2= Extemely attractive. No significant flaws, and close to universally desired. Top 1-2% of girls.
3- = Basically the girl in a group that is clearly more attractive than the others. Anyone definitely referred to as "hot", someone that people would go out of their way to get with. About 15-20% of girls.
3 = 60-70% of girls. All decent, but nothing out of the ordinary. Realistically, they're not really significantly better or worse than each other.
3+ = Not your first choice, but you'd go for it if inebriated or desperate. Most butterfaces fall into this category, except for a few that might climb into the 3 range. About as common as 3-'s.
4= Distinctly unattractive. Someone you would get made fun of at length and universally for getting with. Roughly as common as 2's.
5= Horrendous. You see these only very rarely, about as much as 1's. These go beyond the realm of "typical ugly", and usually require deformities or other highly unusual issues with their appearance.
"Dude, that chick over there. Diamond scale."
"2."
"No way, just a 3-. You don't just hand out 2's."
"True. 3-. Her friends are all 3's. Except for the butterface on the end, that's a 3+."
"Man, he got so drunk he actually got with that girl..."
"You've got to be kidding. She's a total 4."
"Hahahahahahahahahahaha"
"2."
"No way, just a 3-. You don't just hand out 2's."
"True. 3-. Her friends are all 3's. Except for the butterface on the end, that's a 3+."
"Man, he got so drunk he actually got with that girl..."
"You've got to be kidding. She's a total 4."
"Hahahahahahahahahahaha"
by diamondscaleftw October 31, 2011
Get the Diamond Scale mug.Hot crazy-Scale as it is famous from "How I met your mother", a girl can be crazy as long as she is equally hot.
Mark: so what's with that girl Donna you've dated last night?
Barney: Man she playing ping pong on that hot crazy scale! she gave me head under the table then stabbed me with a fork.
Barney: Man she playing ping pong on that hot crazy scale! she gave me head under the table then stabbed me with a fork.
by Rols Rois May 6, 2008
Get the Hot crazy scale mug.by Conrad June 19, 2003
Get the Fish scale mug.The Kinsey Reports were written in the 1940s and 50s which found that there are more than the presumed 3 levels of sexuality (straight, bisexual, or gay), but that there are a multitude of sexual orientations. The research shocked the general public and the findings caused shock and outrage, both because they challenged conventional beliefs about sexuality and because they discussed subjects that had previously been taboo. The belief that heterosexuality and abstinence were both ethical and statistical norms had never before been seriously challenged.
The Kinsey scale ranked individuals from 0 to 6, with 0 being completely heterosexual and 6 completely homosexual. A 1 was considered predominantly heterosexual with only incidental homosexual experiences, a 2 mostly heterosexual with more serious homosexual experiences, a 3 completely equal homosexual and heterosexual experiences, and so on. Kinsey reported that most American males fell in the 1 to 2 range of the scale and that a large majority appeared to be at least somewhat bisexual (in the 1 to 5 range). The study also reported that 10 percent of American males surveyed were mostly or completely homosexual for at least part of their adult lives (in the 5 to 6 range).
The first report (1948) was written about their research on male sexuality and the second report (1953) was written about female sexuality research. The first report was the most astounding and shocking to the public. By the time the second report was published, Kinsey had lost a lot of respect therefore the research wasn't held with nearly as much regard.
The Kinsey scale ranked individuals from 0 to 6, with 0 being completely heterosexual and 6 completely homosexual. A 1 was considered predominantly heterosexual with only incidental homosexual experiences, a 2 mostly heterosexual with more serious homosexual experiences, a 3 completely equal homosexual and heterosexual experiences, and so on. Kinsey reported that most American males fell in the 1 to 2 range of the scale and that a large majority appeared to be at least somewhat bisexual (in the 1 to 5 range). The study also reported that 10 percent of American males surveyed were mostly or completely homosexual for at least part of their adult lives (in the 5 to 6 range).
The first report (1948) was written about their research on male sexuality and the second report (1953) was written about female sexuality research. The first report was the most astounding and shocking to the public. By the time the second report was published, Kinsey had lost a lot of respect therefore the research wasn't held with nearly as much regard.
Still today, Kinsey's Sexuality Scale is related to how we identify and helpful for understanding ourselves. It gives us valid scientific research to connect to our emotions and says that they are legitimate.
by selvy July 21, 2008
Get the Kinsey's Sexuality Scale mug.