a women who has low genetic quality(such as extreme short height) being with a high genetic quality male( tall height)
leading to manlet children who will be ridiculed in front of society leading to him being resentful and turning him slowly into an incel.
leading to manlet children who will be ridiculed in front of society leading to him being resentful and turning him slowly into an incel.
by cocuklugumugomdumgelenolmadi February 2, 2025
Get the incel factory mug.Alternative Facts Syndrome is a person suffering from a disconnect from reality. This person does not accept facts and truths and will claim blatant lies as "facts" in their alternative facts reality.
This person is suffering from Alternative Facts Syndrome. That person believes Tariffs will be paid by the exporting country and will not affect them as the consumer. "They did their research."
by DMU77 February 2, 2025
Get the Alternative Facts Syndrome mug.Related Words
The cynical but often accurate observation that for any complex issue, a person can selectively present isolated data points ("cherry-picked" facts) to construct a compelling but deeply misleading narrative that supports their pre-existing bias. This isn't a claim that all facts are false, but that their power comes from context and omission. A single statistic, a lone study, or an individual anecdote can be wielded as a definitive "truth-totem" while ignoring the vast forest of contradictory evidence surrounding it. In the information age, data isn't power; curation is.
Example: A climate change denier points to a single cold day in July and declares, "See? No global warming! All facts are cherry-pickable." They've plucked one irrelevant data point from a planet-sized dataset of rising temperatures, using a "fact" to fabricate a falsehood. It's the weaponization of the technically-true to obscure the actually-true.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the All Facts Are Cherry-Pickable mug.A woman from Kazakhstan named living in SE Asia... flawless top to bottom, inside and out... literally makes you say wow each time you see her regardless of outfit
by CamboJoff March 16, 2026
Get the Wow Factor mug.A metaphoric or literal place that one has to go back to when dreams die.
Usually contains a line of work that one is much more qualified for.
Must be a non temporary set back.
Usually contains a line of work that one is much more qualified for.
Must be a non temporary set back.
-- literal use--
*fails making it to the next round in a music competition*
"I can carry on working at the chicken factory, so there's always that." - Robert Unwin
-- metaphorical use--
*studied undergraduate philosophy*
I guess I can always go back to the chicken factory -- the coffee shop
*after advance philosophy*
I guess it's back to the chicken factory -- metaphoric stand-in for 'life'
*fails making it to the next round in a music competition*
"I can carry on working at the chicken factory, so there's always that." - Robert Unwin
-- metaphorical use--
*studied undergraduate philosophy*
I guess I can always go back to the chicken factory -- the coffee shop
*after advance philosophy*
I guess it's back to the chicken factory -- metaphoric stand-in for 'life'
by Burgess King February 24, 2025
Get the chicken factory mug.Generally used in the negative to refer to someone who lacks deal factor. It is the quality where people can deal with changes in plan, changes in circumstances, without going above threshold or overreacting.
John? He’s got like no deal factor. We changed the time for brunch by 15 minutes and he freaked out.
by Blider March 19, 2025
Get the deal factor mug.According to AI
1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This factor considers whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds new meaning, purpose, or message to the original work. Uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research are generally favored. Commercial uses are viewed less favorably, but not automatically ruled out as fair use, according to Emerson College Library.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work plays a role. Factual or public documents are more likely to be considered fair use than creative works. For example, using factual information from a book in a news article might be fair use, but using a large portion of a creative novel in a new work might be less likely to be fair use.
3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: This factor looks at how much of the original work is used. Generally, the less used, the better. Courts also consider whether the portion used is the "heart" of the original work. Using only a small portion or a non-essential part is more likely to be fair use, according to Emory Libraries.
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
1. Purpose and Character of the Use: This factor considers whether the use is transformative, meaning it adds new meaning, purpose, or message to the original work. Uses like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research are generally favored. Commercial uses are viewed less favorably, but not automatically ruled out as fair use, according to Emerson College Library.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work: The nature of the copyrighted work plays a role. Factual or public documents are more likely to be considered fair use than creative works. For example, using factual information from a book in a news article might be fair use, but using a large portion of a creative novel in a new work might be less likely to be fair use.
3. Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used: This factor looks at how much of the original work is used. Generally, the less used, the better. Courts also consider whether the portion used is the "heart" of the original work. Using only a small portion or a non-essential part is more likely to be fair use, according to Emory Libraries.
4. Effect of the Use on the Market: This factor considers whether the use harms the market for the original work or any potential markets for it. If the use directly competes with the original work or could potentially harm its future sales, it's less likely to be fair use, according to the University of Washington.
Hym "1. I definitely have an interpretation that adds new meaning (at least as it pertains to the parts of the bible and more broadly Jordan Peterson's work) and I definitely added a new message. Used like criticism. ✔️
2. I use factual work mostly or work put forth as factual. I'll plug some creative work or even use quotes. And I DEFINITELY USE NEWS ARTICLES! That's for sure! ✔️
3. Not much actually. Usually never more than a proposition. But you can't really say Jordan is using Nietzsches work in the "heart." Therefore, my work is in the same "heart" as Jordan's in that regard (all be it in the opposite direction) And you can't say the same about you using MY work because the "heart" of MY work is A. shedding light on the targeted harassment that mirrors the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia I've been subjected to since I was 19 (or sooner) and remediation of this harassment WHICH NONE OF THE MOVIES OR SHOWS ADDRESS AND HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORSE. B. (And I'm quoting myself here) "Demonstrating my abject superiority to all men, women, and children." Which none of this does. The Anime gets a pass but the rest of you don't. C. Getting myself credit AND MONEY for creating AI. I was explicit. ✔️ for me and not for you.
4 factors part 1.
2. I use factual work mostly or work put forth as factual. I'll plug some creative work or even use quotes. And I DEFINITELY USE NEWS ARTICLES! That's for sure! ✔️
3. Not much actually. Usually never more than a proposition. But you can't really say Jordan is using Nietzsches work in the "heart." Therefore, my work is in the same "heart" as Jordan's in that regard (all be it in the opposite direction) And you can't say the same about you using MY work because the "heart" of MY work is A. shedding light on the targeted harassment that mirrors the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia I've been subjected to since I was 19 (or sooner) and remediation of this harassment WHICH NONE OF THE MOVIES OR SHOWS ADDRESS AND HAS ONLY GOTTEN WORSE. B. (And I'm quoting myself here) "Demonstrating my abject superiority to all men, women, and children." Which none of this does. The Anime gets a pass but the rest of you don't. C. Getting myself credit AND MONEY for creating AI. I was explicit. ✔️ for me and not for you.
4 factors part 1.
by Hym Iam April 11, 2025
Get the 4 Factors mug.