OK. So let'
s say Candace Owens is right. Let's say she IS a
man... Now what? What happens then? Because is MY thing is true, the obvious extension and logical conclusion is that we need to create a mechanism to distinguish the
people who actually have schizophrenia from the
people who actually do not and then we need to create an avenue for legal recourse for the
people who are just being communally harassed (because harassment in the workplace is not allowed). Then you would need a mechanism by which to identify it happening in schools and in workplaces and an incentive structure for reporting and a punishment for participating or instigating or propagating. AND THEN... Your kids, friends, and siblings get murdered less. There is less of an incentive to murder you. You
DON'T get stabbed to death in the night by your own kids because their mental health isn't being sandpapered away by the
people around them. But even of
Candy O is right... What actually happens there? Nothing. It's an investigation that affects no one and does nothing.
Hym "Ok. So, let's say that Brigitte Macron IS a
man. You're right. She's a man. Now what?"
Candy O "Well that means the French president is
GAY!"
Hym "He's... He's FRENCH."
Candy O "But if he's a man and she's a man... That's
GAY!"
Hym "Again... Even if she was a woman, there is nothing more
GAY than heterosexual
sex between a French man and... You know, literally anyone."
Candy O "But she's pretending to be a woman but she's a man!"
Hym "I know! It's crazy! She's got a big fat cock but he's wearing a dress! Like, whaaaa?"