Tolerance, in the political and social sense, involves two components: 1. Finding others' beliefs or behavior
wrong or, in some substantive way, highly objectionable. This fundamental disagreement must be present on
issues that really matter, not on
issues that are minor or trivial. 2. In the face of this intense disagreement, one refrains from resolving differences by violence or the threat of violence.
Tolerance is NOT a matter of pluralism or multi-culturalism. In order to be tolerant, one does not accept or find others' actions or attitudes a matter of indifference. Rather, a necessary condition for tolerance is rejection of others' beliefs and way of life.
The upshot of tolerance is fighting a continual civil
war with those whom one disagrees with in non-violent ways. A
society characterized by tolerance will be full of constant confrontation and conflict without threats or violence. As commentator
Jonathan Schwartz has argued, tolerance involves challenging the beliefs that others accept without question including issues surrounding sexuality, religion, and race.
Tolerance also is closely related to free speech. Free speech is primarily designed to promote
free discussion of controversial questions in
politics, religion, and morality. Therefore, speech codes and Politically Correct sensibilities advanced by the
left are restrictions on free speech and are forms of intolerance.
I think
everything you say and believe is immoral and
disgusting. I shall try to eradicate your beliefs from the face of the
earth. But, I shall express my disagreement only verbally and refrain from violence to suppress your point of view. Therefore, I am demonstrating tolerance.