verb. - to utilize the omnipotent online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, to learn more about any given subject.
Tony - I've always wanted to know more about Ducal House of Mecklenburg, but I never have the time to go to the library.
Milo - Dude, just wik it!
Tony - Whoa, it's a North German Princely dynasty with origins in the lords of the vend tribe Obotrites! Sweet!
Milo - Dude, just wik it!
Tony - Whoa, it's a North German Princely dynasty with origins in the lords of the vend tribe Obotrites! Sweet!
by lawran March 2, 2006
Get the wik it mug.Wiki demons are individuals that have decided to posess a given wiki page, and valiantly battle all attempts to change their edits to the page, regardless of how logical or intelligent the change may be.
The defining characteristic that sets wikidemons apart is the fact that their ego drives their interest in the pages they infest, rather than an actual concern for scolarly pursuits.
Like most generic demons, they liken themselves unto gods above the mere mortals that dare enter their self-proclaimed domain.
This does not mean they have any special or insightful knowledge of the page, but that they merely demand that all other beings must be inferior in their understanding of the posessed pages, as the wikidemon's ego can allow no peers to their self-imagined wisdom.
The wikidemons can be most easily spotted by their domination of article history as perpetually reverting any changes that dare go against their self-worshipped decision of what the page should be, and by their complete domination of an article's talk page, often to the point of responding not only to multiple other people who question their ultimate control of the page, but hapless passers by and even themselves.
There are, at this time, no known ways to truly combat, vanquish, slay, banish, or otherwise exorcise wikidemons from their adopted domains.
Until such a method is devised, wikis will forever remain unreliable sources, as any given wikidemon manifestation completely destroys the legitimacy of the page and entire wiki it infests.
The defining characteristic that sets wikidemons apart is the fact that their ego drives their interest in the pages they infest, rather than an actual concern for scolarly pursuits.
Like most generic demons, they liken themselves unto gods above the mere mortals that dare enter their self-proclaimed domain.
This does not mean they have any special or insightful knowledge of the page, but that they merely demand that all other beings must be inferior in their understanding of the posessed pages, as the wikidemon's ego can allow no peers to their self-imagined wisdom.
The wikidemons can be most easily spotted by their domination of article history as perpetually reverting any changes that dare go against their self-worshipped decision of what the page should be, and by their complete domination of an article's talk page, often to the point of responding not only to multiple other people who question their ultimate control of the page, but hapless passers by and even themselves.
There are, at this time, no known ways to truly combat, vanquish, slay, banish, or otherwise exorcise wikidemons from their adopted domains.
Until such a method is devised, wikis will forever remain unreliable sources, as any given wikidemon manifestation completely destroys the legitimacy of the page and entire wiki it infests.
Joe: Why does this page claim satan invented ice cream? I'll remove that reference.
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER? Someone removed my reference to satan inventing icecream? I shall revert this fool's change, and then write 11 paragraphs on the talk page explaining why he's a moron for doubting my logic. It will look nice next to my other 300 paragraphs. I should put it as a reply to myself, since he didn't post to the talk page about why he removed it!
Bob: Why does this page claim satan invented ice cream? I'll remove that reference.
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER?...
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER? Someone removed my reference to satan inventing icecream? I shall revert this fool's change, and then write 11 paragraphs on the talk page explaining why he's a moron for doubting my logic. It will look nice next to my other 300 paragraphs. I should put it as a reply to myself, since he didn't post to the talk page about why he removed it!
Bob: Why does this page claim satan invented ice cream? I'll remove that reference.
Wikidemon: WHO DARES DISTURB MY SLUMBER?...
by Akashic Recorder January 16, 2009
Get the Wikidemon mug.Related Words
wikitrail
• wikitrip
• wikitard
• wikitoria
• wikitangent
• Wikitarded
• wikitastic
• Wikitelligence
• wikithatshit
• wikitrap
Noun: Ethan's act of slappin the salami to the picture of a vagina on wikipedia
Verb: For a boy named Ethan to ejaculate to the picture of a vagina on wikipedia
Verb: For a boy named Ethan to ejaculate to the picture of a vagina on wikipedia
by E-Train 202 February 6, 2010
Get the wiki-sesh mug.exactly like "fuck with," but this is used when the two people talking are playing Wii.
Pronounced: fuck we-ith
Pronounced: fuck we-ith
*Bruce and Drew are playing Wii*
Bruce: So I went on a date with that one chick.
Drew: Dude! Don't fuck wiith me!
Bruce: So I went on a date with that one chick.
Drew: Dude! Don't fuck wiith me!
by NoMSG September 29, 2010
Get the fuck wiith mug.When you cant understand what someone said to you
(either because the other party is foreign, or because you havent brushed up your urban dictionary skills)
You make the statement "skibita wibita"
pronounced: Skeb-it-uh wib-it-uh
(either because the other party is foreign, or because you havent brushed up your urban dictionary skills)
You make the statement "skibita wibita"
pronounced: Skeb-it-uh wib-it-uh
by DutchMaster Scott July 20, 2006
Get the skibita wibita mug."wiki wiki" is Hawaiian for "quick". It's commonly used as word for online help- or manpages that everyone can change.
by Raistlin August 19, 2003
Get the wiki mug.Someone who categorically disputes the accuracy of Wikipedia without knowledge of specific examples. This person believes that Wikipedia is not a 'real encyclopedia' because it doesn't follow a traditional writing / editing process.
Even though Mike was an expert in barebacking, he was just plaing the roll of wikicracker by disputing the Wiki entry, since he didn't even bother reading what was written.
by Le Dutch November 7, 2006
Get the Wikicracker mug.